Abstract:Random parameters model has been demonstrated to be an effective method to account for unobserved heterogeneity that commonly exists in highway crash data. However, the predefined single distribution for each random parameter may limit how the unobserved heterogeneity is captured. A more flexible approach is to develop a random parameters model with heterogeneity in means and variances by allowing the mean and variance of potential each random parameter to be an estimable function of explanatory variables. This burgeoning technique for modelling unobserved heterogeneity has been increasingly applied to various safety evaluation scenarios recently. However, the predictive performance of this emerging method, which determines the practicability of the model for a specific circumstance, has never been investigated as far as our knowledge. In addition, the explanatory power by including heterogeneous means and variances of random parameters need to be further investigated to confirm the potential merits of this method in crash data analysis. In this paper, a random parameters negative binomial with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPNBHMV) model, a standard random parameters negative binomial (RPNB) model and a traditional fixed parameters negative binomial (NB) model were estimated using the same dataset. The explanatory and predictive performance of the three models were thoroughly evaluated and compared. Results showed that: 1) the RPNB model fitted the data significantly better than the NB model, and the RPNBHMV model further improved the statistical fit of the RPNB model but the improvement was slight; 2) more insights into interactions of safety factors were inferred from the RPNBHMV model, which demonstrates the explanatory benefit of this model; 3) the RPNBHMV and RPNB models had both advantages (e.g., produced overall better prediction accuracy) and disadvantages (e. g., provided reduced prediction accuracy across the range of explanatory variables) when applied to in-sample observations (i.e., observations used to estimate the model); 4) the RPNBHMV and RPNB models might be less precise than the NB model when applied to out-of-sample observations. These findings indicate that the RPNBHMV model offers more insights and may be used for explanatory safety analysis for sites where reliable data can be collected. However, the simple NB model is more reliable - at least with the dataset used in this study - than its random parameters model counterparts for other sites where the data are unavailable or unreliable, which is a common safety evaluation scenario in practice.

Crash prediction based on random effect negative binomial model considering data heterogeneity

Predicting Expressway Crash Frequency Using a Random Effect Negative Binomial Model: A Case Study in China

Random-Parameter Multivariate Negative Binomial Regression for Modeling Impacts of Contributing Factors on the Crash Frequency by Crash Types

A Marginalized Random Effects Hurdle Negative Binomial Model for Analyzing Refined-Scale Crash Frequency Data

Application of a Random Effects Negative Binomial Model to Examine Crash Frequency for Freeways in China

Assessing the explanatory and predictive performance of a random parameters count model with heterogeneity in means and variances

Assessing the explanatory and predictive performance of a random parameters count model with heterogeneity in means and variances.

A Correlated Random Parameters Model with Heterogeneity in Means to Account for Unobserved Heterogeneity in Crash Frequency Analysis

A Random-Parameter Negative Binomial Model for Assessing Freeway Crash Frequency by Injury Severity: Daytime Versus Nighttime

Multivariate Random Parameters Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression for Analyzing Urban Midblock Crashes

Comparison of Modelling Methods Accounting for Temporal Correlation in Crash Counts

Analyzing Injury Crashes Using Random-Parameter Bivariate Regression Models

Investigating factors of crash frequency with random effects and random parameters models: New insights from Chinese freeway study

Crash Density and Severity Prediction Using Recurrent Neural Networks Combined with Particle Swarm Optimization

A negative binomial Lindley approach considering spatiotemporal effects for modeling traffic crash frequency with excess zeros

Multivariate Random-Parameters Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model: an Application to Estimate Crash Frequencies at Intersections

Modeling Correlation and Heterogeneity in Crash Rates by Collision Types Using Full Bayesian Random Parameters Multivariate Tobit Model.

Construction of crash prediction model of freeway basic segment based on interactive influence of explanatory variables

Modeling crash spatial heterogeneity: random parameter versus geographically weighting

Predicting Freeway Traffic Crash Severity Using XGBoost-Bayesian Network Model with Consideration of Features Interaction

Correlated Random-Effects Bivariate Poisson Lognormal Model to Study Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Crashes