Abstract:This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm using the high-resolution version of the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model and the total electron content observations from a dense global navigation satellite system network. Driven by time-dependent high-latitude ionospheric convection and auroral precipitation inputs, together with an empirically defined subauroral plasma stream (SAPS) field, our simulation reproduce many observed storm-related ionospheric phenomena, including large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances over Europe, the effects of prompt penetration electric field over South and Central America, and the formation of a storm-enhanced density (SED) plume across the continental United States. Our simulation results reaffirm a number of important characteristics concerning the SED plume: (1) enhanced background ionospheric density is a necessary but not sufficient condition, and enhanced ion drift is required to form the SED plume; (2) the SAPS flow channel does not directly transport the plasma from midnight to postnoon via dusk to form the SED plume, instead, the SED plume is formed at the equatorward and westward edge of the SAPS channel; and (3) the SED plume appears to subcorotate with respect to the Earth. Plain Language Summary Storm-induced ionospheric density variations are a major concern of near-Earth space environment as they could drastically disrupt satellite navigation and telecommunication systems. Although ionospheric disturbances such as traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) and storm-enhanced density (SED) are commonly observed during geomagnetic storms, accurate specification of these phenomena remains a great challenge for geospace models. This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the well-known March 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. The simulated TIDs and SED structures from the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) are compared with the total electron content observations for a dense global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network over Europe, South and Central America, as well as North America. While the model reproduces many observed storm-related ionospheric features, quantitative differences between the simulation results and the GNSS data indicate that further improvements to the TIEGCM (such as a more realistic, self-consistent electrodynamic coupling of the ionosphere and magnetosphere) are required in order to meet the challenges of space weather specification and eventually forecast. This study not only serves a meaningful validation of our numerical model but also sheds some new lights on an apparent paradox concerning the formation of the SED plume. Key Points We have carried out a detailed model-data comparison as a way to validate the model outputs Our simulation results reproduce many observed features, including traveling ionospheric disturbances and the storm-enhanced density plume Our results shed new lights on the formation of the SED plume and its subcorotation motion

Formation of Double Tongues of Ionization During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Contrasting Behavior of the F2 Peak and the Topside Ionosphere in Response to the 2 October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Regional differences of the ionospheric response to the July 2012 geomagnetic storm

Spatial Development of Strong Storm-Induced Ionospheric Perturbations during 25–27 August 2018

A Simulation Study of the Equatorial Ionospheric Response to the October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Magnetic Mapping Effects of Substorm Currents Leading to Auroral Poleward Expansion and Equatorward Retreat

Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm

Multi-Instrumental Observations of Midlatitude Plasma Irregularities over Eastern Asia during a Moderate Magnetic Storm on 16 July 2003

Equatorial and Low‐latitude Ionospheric Response to the 17–18 March 2015 Great Storm over Southeast Asia Longitude Sector

Significant Midlatitude Bubble‐Like Ionospheric Super‐Depletion Structure (BLISS) and Dynamic Variation of Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume During the 23 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Ionospheric Response to the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms: Common Features

High‐Speed Solar Wind Imprints on the Ionosphere During the Recovery Phase of the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

Dynamic Expansion and Merging of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

Persistence of the Long‐Duration Daytime TEC Enhancements at Different Longitudinal Sectors During the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

Geotail Observations of Energetic Ion Species and Magnetic Field in Plasmoid‐like Structures in the Course of an Isolated Substorm Event

Multi-Instrument Observation of the Ionospheric Irregularities and Disturbances during the 23–24 March 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Vertical Characterization on Global Ionospheric Variations During the Magnetic Storm in September 2017 with Hierarchical Subtraction Method

Topside Ionospheric Conditions During the 7–8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm

Multiinstrument Observations of a Geomagnetic Storm and Its Effects on the Arctic Ionosphere: A Case Study of the 19 February 2014 Storm

Large-Scale Ionospheric Disturbances During the 17 March 2015 Storm: A Model-Data Comparative Study

Contemporaneous Appearances of Local-Scale Auroral Spiral and Global-Scale Transpolar Arc: Changes of Auroras and Field-Aligned Current Profiles Before a Substorm and After Its Recovery Phase