The associations between different types of infections and circadian preference and shift work
Bjørn BjorvatnSiri WaageKnut Erik EmberlandSverre LitleskareIngrid K. RebnordIngeborg ForthunGuri Rortveita Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care,University of Bergen,Bergen,Norwayb Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders,Haukeland University Hospital,Bergen,Norwayc Department of Psychosocial Science,University of Bergen,Bergen,Norwayd Research Unit for General Practice,NORCE Norwegian Research Centre,Bergen,Norwaye Department of Disease Burden,Norwegian Institute of Public Health,Bergen,Norway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2303986
2024-01-16
Chronobiology International
Abstract:Disturbed sleep and circadian disruption are reported to increase the risk of infections. People with an evening circadian preference and night workers typically report insufficient sleep, and the aims of the present study were to investigate possible associations between various types of infections and circadian preference and shift work status. Data were collected from an online cross-sectional survey of 1023 participants recruited from the Norwegian practice-based research network in general practice – PraksisNett. The participants completed questions about circadian preference (morning type, intermediate type, evening type), work schedule (day work, shift work without nights, shift work with night shifts), and whether they had experienced infections during the last three months (common cold, throat infection, ear infection, sinusitis, pneumonia/bronchitis, COVID-19, influenza-like illness, skin infection, gastrointestinal infection, urinary infection, venereal disease, eye infection). Data were analyzed with chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses with adjustment for relevant confounders (gender, age, marital status, country of birth, children living at home, and educational level). Results showed that evening types more often reported venereal disease compared to morning types (OR = 4.01, confidence interval (CI) = 1.08–14.84). None of the other infections were significantly associated with circadian preference. Shift work including nights was associated with higher odds of influenza-like illness (OR = 1.97, CI = 1.10–3.55), but none of the other infections. In conclusion, neither circadian preference nor shift work seemed to be strongly associated with risk of infections, except for venereal disease (more common in evening types) and influenza-like illness (more common in night workers). Longitudinal studies are needed for causal inferences.
physiology,biology