Abstract:Quantifying and comparing the scientific output of researchers has become critical for governments, funding agencies and universities. Comparison by reputation and direct assessment of contributions to the field is no longer possible, as the number of scientists increases and traditional definitions about scientific fields become blurred. The h-index is often used for comparing scientists, but has several well-documented shortcomings. In this paper, we introduce a new index for measuring and comparing the publication records of scientists: the pagerank-index (symbolised as π). The index uses a version of pagerank algorithm and the citation networks of papers in its computation, and is fundamentally different from the existing variants of h-index because it considers not only the number of citations but also the actual impact of each citation. We adapt two approaches to demonstrate the utility of the new index. Firstly, we use a simulation model of a community of authors, whereby we create various 'groups' of authors which are different from each other in inherent publication habits, to show that the pagerank-index is fairer than the existing indices in three distinct scenarios: (i) when authors try to 'massage' their index by publishing papers in low-quality outlets primarily to self-cite other papers (ii) when authors collaborate in large groups in order to obtain more authorships (iii) when authors spend most of their time in producing genuine but low quality publications that would massage their index. Secondly, we undertake two real world case studies: (i) the evolving author community of quantum game theory, as defined by Google Scholar (ii) a snapshot of the high energy physics (HEP) theory research community in arXiv. In both case studies, we find that the list of top authors vary very significantly when h-index and pagerank-index are used for comparison. We show that in both cases, authors who have collaborated in large groups and/or published less impactful papers tend to be comparatively favoured by the h-index, whereas the pagerank-index highlights authors who have made a relatively small number of definitive contributions, or written papers which served to highlight the link between diverse disciplines, or typically worked in smaller groups. Thus, we argue that the pagerank-index is an inherently fairer and more nuanced metric to quantify the publication records of scientists compared to existing measures.

Does the Hα-Index Reinforce the Matthew Effect in Science? the Introduction of Agent-Based Simulations into Scientometrics

Does the $h_α$ index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R

The inconsistency of the h-index

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors

A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators

Does the h-index have predictive power?

Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors

Do Hirsch-type Indices Behave the Same in Assessing Single Publications? an Empirical Study of 29 Bibliometric Indicators.

Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity

Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science

How relevant is the predictive power of the h-index? A case study of the time-dependent Hirsch index

The predictability of the Hirsch index evolution

Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance

Statistical Model of Scientific Research Evaluation

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

Big fish and small ponds: why the departmental h-index should not be used to rank universities

Comprehensive evaluation of h-index and its extensions in the domain of mathematics

The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers

An empirical and theoretical critique of the Euclidean index

Extensions of Egghe g-index: Improvements of Hirsch h-index