Comparative evaluation of clinical scoring systems in prediction of severi-ty in acute pancreatitis
Juan YANG,Sheng ZHENG,Fan ZHANG,Zhanju LIU
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of four scoring systems, including BISAP, Ranson score, CTSI, SIRS score in the ability of early prediction of acute pancreatitis (AP) severity, local complications, organ failure, and the ability to assess the comparative mortality. Methods The clinical data of 1290 AP in the Tenth People′s Hospital of Shanghai City from June 2013 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. BISAP, Ranson, CTSI, SIRS score were given for all patients. The difference of distribution of each score in mild, moderately severe, sever AP were compared, the ability of BISAP, Ranson, CTSI, SIRS score in predicting severity of AP, local complications, organ failure, and mortality were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results In 1290 AP cases, 60 cases were mild acute pancre-atitis (MAP), 410 cases were moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP), 200 cases were severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), 80 cases were with pseudocyst, 90 cases were with pancreatic necrosis, 300 cases were withpleural effusion, 330 cases were with SIRS, 140 cases with sustained organ failure, 10 cases dead. BISAP, AUC of Ranson, SIRS, CTSI in in predicting SAP were 0.905 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.845-0.965), 0.938 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.891-0.986), 0.812(P=0.000, 95%CI:0.691-0.932), 0.834 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.726-0.942), the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The predicting local complications A UC were 0.874 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.808-0.940), 0.726 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.619-0.833), 0.668 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.557-0.778), 0.848(P=0.000, 95%CI:0.767-0.929), AUC of BISAP, Ranson were compared with SIRS, the differences were statistically signifi-cant (P<0.05). In predicting organ failure AUC were 0.904 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.838-0.976), 0.917 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.856-0.978), 0.758 (P=0.002, 95%CI: 0.618-0.897), 0.849 (P=0.000, 95%CI:0.734-0.965), AUC pairwise of Ran-son and SIRS were compared, the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The predicting the mortality AUC were 0.680, 0.880, 0.824, 0.827, four scoring system were compared, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion BISAP, Ranson, SIRS, CTSI all have good performance in predicting the severity and capability similar. BISAP, Ranson, CTSI have similar ability in predicting the local complications, they are better than SIRS score. SIRS is less powerful in predicting organ failure. There is no significance in these in predicting the mortality.