Exploring geriatric assessment‐driven rehabilitation referral patterns and its influence on functional outcomes and survival in older adults with advanced cancer

Rachelle Brick,Marielle Jensen‐Battaglia,Brennan P. Streck,Lindsey Page,Rachael Tylock,Jenna Cacciatore,Karen Mustian,Jamil Khatri,Jeff Giguere,Elie G. Dib,Supriya Mohile,Eva Culakova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19250
2024-11-03
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:Background Older adults with advanced cancer experience functional disability that warrants rehabilitation services; however, evidence indicates inconsistencies in referral. The purpose was to (1) identify predictors of geriatric assessment (GA)‐driven referrals to rehabilitation services and (2) explore associations between referral and change in function, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival among older adults with advanced cancer. Methods This was a secondary analysis (NCT020107443, UG1CA189961) of a nationwide GA clinical trial. Patients were older adults with advanced cancer who had at least one GA‐defined physical performance or functional status impairment. Primary outcomes were oncologist‐initiated discussion about or referral to rehabilitation services after the GA (Aim 1) and decline in activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and HRQoL within 3 months, and overall survival at 1 year (Exploratory Aims). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Demographic and clinical factors were controlled for by using 1:1 propensity score matching. Results In total 265 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, impaired cognition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, p = 0.01), Karnofsky score indicating disability (OR = 2.86, p
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?