One-stage Posterior Debridement, Bone Grafting Fusion, and Mono-Segment Vs. Short-Segment Fixation for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

Zheng Liu,Weiwei Li,Zhengchao Xu,Xiyang Wang,Hao Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-x
IF: 2.562
2020-01-01
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Abstract:Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n = 32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n = 30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3 months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?