Examining Risk Factor and Recidivism Rate Differences Between Youth Adjudicated for Sex and Non-Sex Offenses: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

William T. Miller,Christopher J. D’Amato,Amber A. Petkus,Christina A. Campbell,Eurielle Kiki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2024.2303644
2024-01-19
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Abstract:Youth adjudicated for sex offenses are frequently overridden to high-risk on general recidivism risk assessments. Little research supports this use of overrides. This study seeks to examine the extent to which those adjudicated for sex and non-sex offenses differ on recidivism rates in a sample of 1,380 sex and non-sex offending youth from a Midwestern state juvenile court. Propensity score matching was used to examine general recidivism rate differences between those adjudicated for sex and non-sex offenses. After matching youth on race, age, and eight criminogenic risk factors, youth adjudicated for sexual offenses recidivated at a significantly lower rate.
psychology, multidisciplinary,criminology & penology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?