Abstract:Classification approaches have been increasingly applied to differentiate patients and normal controls using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data (RS-fMRI). Although most previous classification studies have reported promising accuracy within individual datasets, achieving high levels of accuracy with multiple datasets remains challenging for two main reasons: high dimensionality, and high variability across subjects. We used two independent RS-fMRI datasets (n = 31, 46, respectively) both with eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) conditions. For each dataset, we first reduced the number of features to a small number of brain regions with paired t-tests, using the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) as a metric. Second, we employed a new method for feature extraction, named the PAIR method, examining EC and EO as paired conditions rather than independent conditions. Specifically, for each dataset, we obtained EC minus EO (EC-EO) maps of ALFF from half of subjects (n = 15 for dataset-1, n = 23 for dataset-2) and obtained EO-EC maps from the other half (n = 16 for dataset-1, n = 23 for dataset-2). A support vector machine (SVM) method was used for classification of EC RS-fMRI mapping and EO mapping. The mean classification accuracy of the PAIR method was 91.40% for dataset-1, and 92.75% for dataset-2 in the conventional frequency band of 0.01-0.08 Hz. For cross-dataset validation, we applied the classifier from dataset-1 directly to dataset-2, and vice versa. The mean accuracy of cross-dataset validation was 94.93% for dataset-1 to dataset-2 and 90.32% for dataset-2 to dataset-1 in the 0.01-0.08 Hz range. For the UNPAIR method, classification accuracy was substantially lower (mean 69.89% for dataset-1 and 82.97% for dataset-2), and was much lower for cross-dataset validation (64.69% for dataset-1 to dataset-2 and 64.98% for dataset-2 to dataset-1) in the 0.01-0.08 Hz range. In conclusion, for withingroup design studies (e. g., paired conditions or follow-up studies), we recommend the PAIR method for feature extraction. In addition, dimensionality reduction with strong prior knowledge of specific brain regions should also be considered for feature selection in neuroimaging studies.

Comparison of Feature Selection Methods Based on Discrimination and Reliability for Fmri Decoding Analysis.

PAIR Comparison Between Two Within-Group Conditions of Resting-State Fmri Improves Classification Accuracy

A Stepwise Discriminant Analysis and FBCSP Feature Selection Strategy for EEG MI Recognition

A Novel Feature Selection Approach for Analyzing High dimensional Functional MRI Data

Feature Selection of Fmri Data Based on Normalized Mutual Information and Fisher Discriminant Ratio

An empirical comparison of different LDA methods in fMRI-based brain states decoding

Decoding Brain Image Data Using Machine Learning

Two-Step Paretial Least Square Regression Classifiers In Brain-State Decoding Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A Novel Approach for Stable Selection of Informative Redundant Features from High Dimensional fMRI Data

Improved Sparse Decomposition Based on a Smoothed L0 Norm Using a Laplacian Kernel to Select Features from Fmri Data

Toward Optimal Feature and Time Segment Selection by Divergence Method for EEG Signals Classification

Classification of Depressive Disorder Based on RS-fMRI Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis with Multiple Features

Feature Selection Method Based on Menger Curvature and LDA Theory for a P300 Brain-Computer Interface

Comparative Study Of Svm Methods Combined With Voxel Selection For Object Category Classification On Fmri Data

Multi-subject brain decoding with multi-task feature selection.

A novel multigranularity feature-selection method based on neighborhood mutual information and its application in autistic patient identification

Discriminative analysis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder using fNIRS

A feature selection approach to estimate discrimination capability of feature subset category

Study on feature selection method for cerebral cortex thickness

Discriminative Clustering and Feature Selection for Brain MRI Segmentation

Feature Selection and Combination of Information in the Functional Brain Connectome for Discrimination of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Analyses of Altered Brain Patterns