Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control
David L Smith, T Alex Perkins, Robert C Reiner Jr, Christopher M Barker, Tianchan Niu, Luis Fernando Chaves, Alicia M Ellis, Dylan B George, Arnaud Le Menach, Juliet RC Pulliam, Donal Bisanzio, Caroline Buckee, Christinah Chiyaka, Derek AT Cummings, Andres J Garcia, Michelle L Gatton, Peter W Gething, David M Hartley, Geoffrey Johnston, Eili Y Klein, Edwin Michael, Alun L Lloyd, David M Pigott, William K Reisen, Nick Ruktanonchai, Brajendra K Singh, Jeremy Stoller, Andrew J Tatem, Uriel Kitron, H Charles J Godfray, Justin M Cohen, Simon I Hay, Thomas W Scott
2014-04-01
Abstract:Mosquito-borne diseases pose some of the greatest challenges in public health, especially in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. Efforts to control these diseases have been underpinned by a theoretical framework developed for malaria by Ross and Macdonald, including models, metrics for measuring transmission, and theory of control that identifies key vulnerabilities in the transmission cycle. That framework, especially Macdonald's formula for R0 and its entomological derivative, vectorial capacity, are now used to study dynamics and design interventions for many mosquito-borne diseases. A systematic review of 388 models published between 1970 and 2010 found that the vast majority adopted the Ross–Macdonald assumption of homogeneous transmission in a well-mixed population. Studies comparing models and data question these assumptions and point to the capacity to model …