UV and U-band luminosity functions from CLAUDS and HSC-SSP - I. Using four million galaxies to simultaneously constrain the very faint and bright regimes to z similar to 3

Thibaud Moutard,Marcin Sawicki,Stephane Arnouts,Anneya Golob,Jean Coupon,Olivier Ilbert,Xiaohu Yang,Stephen Gwyn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa706
IF: 4.8
2020-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:We constrain the rest-frame FUV (1546 angstrom), NUV (2345 angstrom), and U-band (3690 angstrom) luminosity functions (LFs) and luminosity densities (LDs) with unprecedented precision from z similar to 0.2 to z similar to 3 (FUV, NUV) and z similar to 2 (U band). Our sample of over 4.3 million galaxies, selected from the CFHT Large Area U-band Deep Survey (CLAUDS) and HyperSupfi me-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP) data lets us probe the very faint regime (down to M-FUV, M-NUV, M-U similar or equal to -15 at low redshift), while simultaneously detecting very rare galaxies at the bright end down to comoving densities <10(-5) Mpc(-3). Our FUV and NUV LFs are well fitted by single-Schechter functions, with faint-end slopes that are very stable up to z similar to 2. We confirm, but self-consistently and with much better precision than previous studies, that the LDs at all three wavelengths increase rapidly with lookback time to z similar to 1, and then much more slowly at 1 < z < 2-3. Evolution of the FUV and NUV LFs and LDs at z < 1 is driven almost entirely by the fading of the characteristic magnitude, M-UV*, while at z > 1 it is due to the evolution of both M-UV*, and the characteristic number density phi(UV)*. In contrast, the U-band LF has an excess of faint galaxies and is fitted with a double-Schechter form; M-U*, both phi(U)* components, and the bright-end slope evolve throughout 0.2 < z < 2, while the faint-end slope is constant over at least the measurable 0.05 < z < 0.6. We present tables of our Schechter parameters and LD measurements that can be used for testing theoretical galaxy evolution models and forecasting future observations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?