Evidence for a role of synchrony but not common fate in the perception of biological group movements

Emiel Cracco,Liuba Papeo,Jan R. Wiersema
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16356
IF: 3.698
2024-05-07
European Journal of Neuroscience
Abstract:Human adult participants observed groups of four point‐light walkers moving in or out of synchrony, in the same or different directions, upright or inverted, while brain activity was measured with EEG. Brain responses coupled to the walking frequency (2.4 Hz) were analysed as a measure of biological motion processing. Brain responses were enhanced when the walkers moved in sync vs. out of sync, but only when they were presented upright. Extensive research has shown that observers are able to efficiently extract summary information from groups of people. However, little is known about the cues that determine whether multiple people are represented as a social group or as independent individuals. Initial research on this topic has primarily focused on the role of static cues. Here, we instead investigate the role of dynamic cues. In two experiments with male and female human participants, we use EEG frequency tagging to investigate the influence of two fundamental Gestalt principles ‐ synchrony and common fate ‐ on the grouping of biological movements. In Experiment 1, we find that brain responses coupled to four point‐light figures walking together are enhanced when they move in sync vs. out of sync, but only when they are presented upright. In contrast, we found no effect of movement direction (i.e., common fate). In Experiment 2, we rule out that synchrony takes precedence over common fate by replicating the null effect of movement direction while keeping synchrony constant. These results suggest that synchrony plays an important role in the processing of biological group movements. In contrast, the role of common fate is less clear and will require further research.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?