Sorafenib and Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RR-DTC): a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guoli Feng,Yi Luo,Qi Zhang,Feng Zeng,Jie Xu,Jingqiang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-02167-6
2020-01-01
Endocrine
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Except conventional treatments, research on medical approach for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) was considered particularly challenging. Sorafenib, a novel biological agent, has been widely studied in the treatment of RR-DTC for years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficiency and safety of treating RR-DTC patients with sorafenib.METHODS:An electronic search on PubMed/Medline and Embase was carried out to search associated articles. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were chose according to the heterogeneity.RESULTS:A total of 15 eligible studies (636 patients) were included. As shown by the only randomised clinical trial-DECISION, sorafenib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in patients with progressive RR-DTC. The pooled analysis indicated that there were 26% patients (95% CI: 0.19-0.34) achieved partial response (PR), and 44% patients (98% CI: 0.39-0.48) achieved stable disease (SD). The most frequent adverse effects (AEs) observed included hand-foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhoea, fatigue, alopecia, weight loss (WS) and rash, the incidence of all grades AEs for which were 71%, 60%, 59%, 55%, 51% and 50%, respectively. There were 68% patients (252/368), who had a dose reduction because of the drug toxicities and AEs.CONCLUSIONS:Sorafenib could improve PFS in patients with progressive RR-DTC, comparing with placebo. Due to the resistance to conventional treatments, sorafenib is considered as a promising treatment for RR-DTC by most physicians specialised in this field. However, the use of sorafenib should be cautious due to a high incidence of AEs caused by the agent. More effective agents with less toxicities are warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?