Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories over the Life Course

Hongwei Ji,Andy Kim,Joseph E. Ebinger,Teemu J. Niiranen,Brian L. Claggett,C. Noel Bairey Merz,Susan Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5306
2020-01-01
JAMA Cardiology
Abstract:Key PointsQuestionHow do patterns of blood pressure (BP) change over the life course and differ between sexes? FindingsIn this analysis of 4 community cohort studies, trajectories of BP elevation in 32833 individuals (54% women) were examined serially over 4 decades (age span, 5 to 98 years). Women compared with men exhibited a steeper increase in BP measures that began as early as in the third decade and continued throughout the life course. MeaningSex differences in BP trajectories, which begin early and persist with aging, may set the stage for later-life cardiovascular diseases that frequently present differently in women vs men. ImportanceIf we assume that women and men exhibit variations of the same fundamental vascular physiology, then conventional analyses of subclinical measures would suggest that women catch up to men by midlife in the extent of potentially important vascular disease. Alternatively, under the assumption that vascular physiology may fundamentally differ between women and men, a sex-specific analysis of existing data could offer new insights and augment our understanding of sex differences in cardiovascular diseases. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether longitudinal patterns of blood pressure (BP) elevation differ between women and men during the life course when considering baseline BP levels as the reference. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe conducted sex-specific analyses of longitudinal BP measures (144599 observations) collected for a period of 43 years (1971 to 2014) in 4 community-based US cohort studies. The combined total included 32833 participants (54% female) spanning ages 5 to 98 years. Data were analyzed between May 4, 2019, and August 5, 2019. ExposuresAge and serially assessed longitudinal BP measures: systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP). Main Outcomes and MeasuresSex-specific change in each primary BP measure compared with baseline BP levels, derived from multilevel longitudinal models fitted over the age span, and new-onset cardiovascular disease events. ResultsOf the 32833 participants, 17733 were women (54%). Women compared with men exhibited a steeper increase in BP that began as early as in the third decade and continued through the life course (likelihood ratio test chi (2)=531 for systolic BP; chi (2)=123 for diastolic BP; chi (2)=325 for MAP; and chi (2)=572 for PP; P for all <.001). After adjustment for multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, these between-sex differences in all BP trajectories persisted (likelihood ratio test (2)=314 for systolic BP; chi (2)=31 for diastolic BP; chi (2)=129 for MAP; and chi (2)=485 for PP; P for all <.001). Conclusions and RelevanceIn contrast with the notion that important vascular disease processes in women lag behind men by 10 to 20 years, sex-specific analyses indicate that BP measures actually progress more rapidly in women than in men, beginning early in life. This early-onset sexual dimorphism may set the stage for later-life cardiovascular diseases that tend to present differently, not simply later, in women compared with men. This study evaluates whether longitudinal patterns of blood pressure elevation differ between women and men during the life course when considering baseline blood pressure levels as the reference.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?