First‐in‐man Study of a Thinner‐strut Sirolimus‐eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold (FUTURE‐I): Three‐year Clinical and Imaging Outcomes

Lei Song,Zhongwei Sun,Changdong Guan,Hongbing Yan,Mengyue Yu,Jingang Cui,Chaowei Mu,Hong Qiu,Yida Tang,Yanyan Zhao,Shubin Qiao,Harry Suryapranata,Runlin Gao,Bo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28722
IF: 2.3
2020-01-01
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Objectives The FUTURE-I study aimed to assess preliminary safety and effectiveness with the long-term clinical and imaging follow-up for the Firesorb (MicroPort, Shanghai, China), a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS). Background First-generation BRS has been associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up. Methods In this prospective, open-label, first-in-man study, patients with single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 into two cohorts after successful Firesorb implantation: cohort 1 (n = 30) underwent multimodality imaging assessment at 6 and 24 months; and cohort 2 (n = 15) at 12 and 36 months. All patients underwent clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually up to 5 years. Results Between January and March 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. At 3-year follow-up, one patient had experienced target lesion failure and none scaffold thrombosis. In-scaffold minimal lumen diameter decreased significantly from 6-month to 2-year (2.53 +/- 0.24 mm vs. 2.27 +/- 0.37 mm, p = .0003), and only numerically from 1-year to 3-year follow-up (2.48 +/- 0.28 mm vs. 2.22 +/- 0.13 mm, p = .08). By optical coherence tomography, neointimal strut coverage at 3-year follow-up was 99.8%, and very low rate of late scaffold discontinuity was observed, only in one patient on two cross sections with three malapposed struts. Conclusions At 3-year follow-up of the FUTURE-I study, implantation of the thinner-strut Firesorb BRS appeared preliminary feasible and effective in the treatment of patients with noncomplex coronary lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?