Abstract:Key points Although learning can arise from few or even a single trial, synaptic plasticity is commonly assessed under prolonged activation. Here, we explored the existence of rapid responsiveness of synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses in a major synaptic learning rule, spike‐timing‐dependent plasticity (STDP). We found that spike‐timing‐dependent depression (tLTD) progressively disappears when the number of paired stimulations (below 50 pairings) is decreased whereas spike‐timing‐dependent potentiation (tLTP) displays a biphasic profile: tLTP is observed for 75–100 pairings, is absent for 25–50 pairings and re‐emerges for 5–10 pairings. This tLTP induced by low numbers of pairings (5–10) depends on activation of the endocannabinoid system, type‐1 cannabinoid receptor and the transient receptor potential vanilloid type‐1. Endocannabinoid‐tLTP may represent a physiological mechanism operating during the rapid learning of new associative memories and behavioural rules characterizing the flexible behaviour of mammals or during the initial stages of habit learning. AbstractSynaptic plasticity, a main substrate for learning and memory, is commonly assessed with prolonged stimulations. Since learning can arise from few or even a single trial, synaptic strength is expected to adapt rapidly. However, whether synaptic plasticity occurs in response to limited event occurrences remains elusive. To answer this question, we investigated whether a low number of paired stimulations can induce plasticity in a major synaptic learning rule, spike‐timing‐dependent plasticity (STDP). It is known that 100 pairings induce bidirectional STDP, i.e. spike‐timing‐dependent potentiation (tLTP) and depression (tLTD) at most central synapses. In rodent striatum, we found that tLTD progressively disappears when the number of paired stimulations is decreased (below 50 pairings) whereas tLTP displays a biphasic profile: tLTP is observed for 75–100 pairings, absent for 25–50 pairings and re‐emerges for 5–10 pairings. This tLTP, induced by very few pairings (∼5–10) depends on the endocannabinoid (eCB) system. This eCB‐dependent tLTP (eCB‐tLTP) involves postsynaptic endocannabinoid synthesis, requires paired activity (post‐ and presynaptic) and the activation of type‐1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) and transient receptor potential vanilloid type‐1 (TRPV1). eCB‐tLTP occurs in both striatopallidal and striatonigral medium‐sized spiny neurons (MSNs) and is dopamine dependent. Lastly, we show that eCB‐LTP and eCB‐LTD can be induced sequentially in the same neuron, depending on the cellular conditioning protocol. Thus, while endocannabinoids are usually thought simply to depress synaptic function, they also constitute a versatile system underlying bidirectional plasticity. Our results reveal a novel form of synaptic plasticity, eCB‐tLTP, which may underlie rapid learning capabilities characterizing behavioural flexibility.

Cortical Synaptic AMPA Receptor Plasticity during Motor Learning.

Long-term Potentiation Alters the Modulator Pharmacology of AMPA-type Glutamate Receptors.

[Research Progress on Barrel Cortex and Its Plasticity].

Visualization of NMDA receptor-dependent AMPA receptor synaptic plasticity in vivo.

Learning-induced remodelling of inhibitory synapses in the motor cortex

Activity-Dependent Remodeling of Corticostriatal Axonal Boutons During Motor Learning

Labelling and Optical Erasure of Synaptic Memory Traces in the Motor Cortex

Stimulus-dependent synaptic plasticity underlies neuronal circuitry refinement in the mouse primary visual cortex

Imaging of AMPA receptors and synaptic plasticity

The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity

Endocannabinoids Mediate Bidirectional Striatal Spike‐timing‐dependent Plasticity

Time‐dependent Postsynaptic AMPA GluR1 Receptor Recruitment in the Cingulate Synaptic Potentiation

AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic FractionsIn Vivo

Brain-wide measurement of synaptic protein turnover reveals localized plasticity during learning

Synapse specific and plasticity-regulated AMPAR mobility tunes synaptic integration

Control of synaptic plasticity in deep cortical networks

Rapid Formation and Selective Stabilization of Synapses for Enduring Motor Memories

Common Molecular Pathways Mediate Long-Term Potentiation of Synaptic Excitation and Slow Synaptic Inhibition

[AMPA Receptors and Neuronal Plasticity]

Motor training promotes both synaptic and intrinsic plasticity of layer V pyramidal neurons in the primary motor cortex

Graded Control of Climbing-Fiber-Mediated Plasticity and Learning by Inhibition in the Cerebellum