Abstract:Objective: To study the effect of intervertebral grafting area on the effect of single segment lumbar posterior decompression and intervertebral bone grafting fusion. Methods: The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent single-segment lumbar posterior decompression pedicle internal fixation and bone grafting fusion from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospective reviewed. The area of the intervertebral bone graft was measured one week postoperatively using Computed Tomography (CT), and based on the ratio of the bone graft area to the average area of the endplates, the patients were divided into three groups:17 cases in group A(the intervertebral bone graft area did not exceed the area of one pedicle) included 9 males and 8 females with an average age of (56.0±11.5) years old;15 cases in group B(the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded one pedicle but did not reach the opposite pedicle) included 10 males and 5 females with an average of (52.0±14.0) years old; 20 cases in group C (the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded the opposite pedicle) included 12 males and 8 females with an average of (49.5±12.8) years old. X-rays and CT scans were performed at 3, 6, 12 months, and the final follow-up postoperatively, the interbody fusion Brantigan scores, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at each follow-up were recorded. Results: The gender, age, and surgical segments showed no significant differences among three groups(P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the preoperative VAS and ODI among three groups (P>0.05). All patients of three groups were followed up from 12 to 36 months. Compared with preoperative, VAS and ODI scores of three groups showed significant improvement at 1 week postoperatively and the final follow-up (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative measurements, the height of the intervertebral space was restored at 1 week postoperatively in three groups;at the final follow-up, the loss of height in the intervertebral space was less in groups B and C, and the height of the intervertebral space in group B and C was significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05). The modified Brantigan scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (P<0.05);at 12 months postoperatively, the scores in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);however, at the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified Brantigan scores among three groups(P>0.05). The bone graft fusion rate in group C was significantly higher than in groups A and B at 3 months postoperatively(P<0.05);at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the fusion rates in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);at the final follow-up, the fusion rate in group A was still lower than in groups B and C, but the difference among three groups was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: Single segment posterior lumbar decompression and interbody fusion surgery can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with lumbar degenerative related diseases. However, as the proportion of bone grafting area increases, the early bone grafting fusion rate and fusion score of patients are significantly improved.

Effect of Trabecular Microstructure of Spinous Process on Spinal Fusion and Clinical Outcomes after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Bone Surface/Total Volume As Independent Favorable Indicator for Fusion Success.

The correlation between bone mineral density and surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Application of Small Surgical Incision Bilateral Spinous Process in Posterior Single Segment Lumbar Interbody Fusion

[Effect of intervertebral bone graft area on the effect of single-level posterior lumbar decompression and bone graft fusion]

Influence of facetectomy, cross-link augmentation, and interbody procedure on progression of bone fusion in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the long cortical bone trajectory technique

Clinical application of spinous process forming in posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Effects on clinical outcomes of grafts and spacers used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a critical review.

Biomechanical Assessment of Different Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs in Normal and Osteoporotic Condition-A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Vitro

Clinical Study of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Bone Structure from Spinous Process Root to Vertebral Lamina and Transpedicular Fixation in Treating Lumbar Instability

[Clinical Application of a Novel Posterior Lumbar Fusion Method and the Short-Term Observation of Its Effect].

A clinical comparison of three bone graft materials for posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Vertebral Bone Quality Score as a Predictor of Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study

Peripheral cortical bone density predicts vertebral bone mineral properties in spine fusion surgery patients

Fat Infiltration of Paraspinal Muscles As an Independent Risk for Bone Nonunion after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Biomechanical characterization of vertebral body replacement in situ: Effects of different fixation strategies

Application of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with the Join Structure of Spinous Process and Veterbral Plate in Lumbar Fusion Operation

Microstructural Properties of Trabecular Bone Autografts: Comparison of Men and Women with and Without Osteoporosis

Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages