Abstract:To achieve scalability of query answering, the developers of Semantic Web applications are often forced to use incomplete OWL 2 reasoners, which fail to derive all answers for at least one query, ontology, and data set. The lack of completeness guarantees, however, may be unacceptable for applications in areas such as health care and defence, where missing answers can adversely affect the applications functionality. Furthermore, even if an application can tolerate some level of incompleteness, it is often advantageous to estimate how many and what kind of answers are being lost. In this paper, we present a novel logic-based framework that allows one to check whether a reasoner is complete for a given query Q and ontology T---that is, whether the reasoner is guaranteed to compute all answers to Q w.r.t. T and an arbitrary data set A. Since ontologies and typical queries are often fixed at application design time, our approach allows application developers to check whether a reasoner known to be incomplete in general is actually complete for the kinds of input relevant for the application. We also present a technique that, given a query Q, an ontology T, and reasoners R_1 and R_2 that satisfy certain assumptions, can be used to determine whether, for each data set A, reasoner R_1 computes more answers to Q w.r.t. T and A than reasoner R_2. This allows application developers to select the reasoner that provides the highest degree of completeness for Q and T that is compatible with the applications scalability requirements. Our results thus provide a theoretical and practical foundation for the design of future ontology-based information systems that maximise scalability while minimising or even eliminating incompleteness of query answers.

Extracting a Justification for OWL Ontologies by Critical Axioms

Towards counterfactual explanations for ontologies

Paraconsistent Reasoning with OWL - Algorithms and the ParOWL Reasoner ?

Algorithms for Paraconsistent Reasoning with OWL

Black-box Testing of First-Order Logic Ontologies Using WordNet

OWL reasoning over big biomedical data

Large-Scale Reasoning with OWL

Applying the Closed World Assumption to SUMO-based FOL Ontologies for Effective Commonsense Reasoning

A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet

A Framework for Parallelizing OWL Classification in Description Logic Reasoners

Towards a Framework for Evaluating Explanations in Automated Fact Verification

Automated reasoning support for Standpoint-OWL 2

Reasoning about Exceptions in Ontologies: from the Lexicographic Closure to the Skeptical Closure

Creating Signature-Based Views for Description Logic Ontologies with Transitivity and Qualified Number Restrictions

An Argumentation-Based Legal Reasoning Approach for DL-Ontology

An Approach to Generating Arguments over DL-Lite Ontologies.

An Argumentation Framework for Description Logic Ontology Reasoning and Management

VEL: A Formally Verified Reasoner for OWL2 EL Profile

Extracting Ontological Knowledge from Textual Descriptions

Reasoning about semantic Web in Isabelle/HOL

Completeness Guarantees for Incomplete Ontology Reasoners: Theory and Practice