Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

VariFAST: a Variant Filter by Automated Scoring Based on Tagged-Signatures

FVC as an adaptive and accurate method for filtering variants from popular NGS analysis pipelines

GARFIELD-NGS: Genomic vARiants FIltering by dEep Learning moDels in NGS

GVAF: generalized, flexible filtering software for annotated variant files

Fast and accurate variant identification tool for sequencing-based studies

Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery

A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree

DeepFilter: A Deep Learning Based Variant Filter for VarDict

Genomevip: A Cloud Platform For Genomic Variant Discovery And Interpretation

Smart variant filtering - A blueprint solution for massively parallel sequencing-based variant analysis

OVarFlow: a resource optimized GATK 4 based Open source Variant calling workFlow

Filterlap: Filtering False-Positive Mutation Calls Via A Label Propagation Framework

Fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit

Refinement of genetic variants needs attention

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

Consensus Rules in Variant Detection from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

VarSim: a high-fidelity simulation and validation framework for high-throughput genome sequencing with cancer applications

AutoGVP: a dockerized workflow integrating ClinVar and InterVar germline sequence variant classification

VariantDetective: an accurate all-in-one pipeline for detecting consensus bacterial SNPs and SVs

Variant analysis pipeline for accurate detection of genomic variants from transcriptome sequencing data

Toward Fast and Accurate SNP Genotyping from Whole Genome Sequencing Data for Bedside Diagnostics