Abstract:Abstract We use machine learning algorithms (artificial neural networks, ANNs) to estimate petrophysical models at seismic scale combining well-log information, seismic data and seismic attributes. The resulting petrophysical images are the prior inputs in the process of full-waveform inversion (FWI). We calculate seismic attributes from a stacked reflected 2-D seismic section and then train ANNs to approximate the following petrophysical parameters: P-wave velocity ( $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p ), density ( $$\rho $$ ρ ) and volume of clay ( $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay ). We extend the use of the $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay by constraining it with the well lithology and we establish two classes: sands and shales. Consequently, machine learning allows us to build an initial estimate of the earth property model ( $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p ), which is iteratively refined to produce a synthetic seismogram that matches the observed seismic data. We apply the 1-D Kennett method as a forward modeling tool to create synthetic data with the images of $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p , $$\rho $$ ρ and the thickness of layers (sands or shales) obtained with the ANNs. A nonlinear least-squares inversion algorithm minimizes the residual (or misfit) between observed and synthetic full-waveform data, which improves the $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p resolution. In order to show the advantage of using the ANN velocity model as the initial velocity model for the inversion, we compare the results obtained with the ANNs and two other initial velocity models. One of these alternative initial velocity models is computed via P-wave impedance, and the other is achieved by velocity semblance analysis: root-mean-square velocity (RMS). The results are in good agreement when we use $$\rho $$ ρ and $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p obtained by ANNs. However, the results are poor and the synthetic data do not match the real acquired data when using the semblance velocity model and the $$\rho $$ ρ from the well log (constant for the entire 2-D section). Nevertheless, the results improve when including $$\rho $$ ρ , the layered structure driven by the $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay (both obtained with ANNs) and the semblance velocity model. When doing inversion starting with the initial $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p model estimated using the P-wave impedance, there is some gain of the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p with respect to the RMS initial $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p . To assess the quality of the inversion of $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p , we use the information for two available wells and compare the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p obtained with ANNs and the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p computed with the P-wave impedance. This shows the benefit of employing ANNs estimations as prior models during the inversion process to obtain a final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p that is in agreement with the geology and with the seismic and well-log data. To illustrate the computation of the final velocity model via FWI, we provide an algorithm with the detailed steps and its corresponding GitHub code.

Velocity model building in a cross-well acquisition geometry with image-trained artificial neural networks

VMB-Net: A Deep Learning Network for Velocty Model Building in a Cross-Well Acquisition Geometry

High-Resolution Velocity Model Building Based on Common-Source Migration Images and Convolutional Neural Networks

Seismic velocity model building using neural networks: Training data design and learning generalization

Multi-receptive Field Distillation Network for seismic velocity model building

Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic velocity model building method

S-wave velocity inversion and prediction using a deep hybrid neural network

Deep Velocity Generator: A Plug-In Network for FWI Enhancement.

Cyclic Learning Rate U-Shaped ResNet Embedded with Dual Attentions for Velocity Model Building

Seismic velocity inversion based on CNN-LSTM fusion deep neural network

Automatic velocity analysis using interpretable multi-mode neural networks

Time-lapse velocity imaging via deep learning

Seismic Wavefields Modeling With Variable Horizontally Layered Velocity Models via Velocity-Encoded PINN

Deep learning strategy for salt model building

Data-driven S-wave velocity prediction method via a deep-learning-based deep convolutional gated recurrent unit fusion network

Deep-pretrained-FWI: combining supervised learning with physics-informed neural network

Shear wave velocity prediction for fractured limestone reservoirs based on artificial neural network

Machine Learning as a Seismic Prior Velocity Model Building Method for Full-Waveform Inversion: A Case Study from Colombia

Multi-Scale Acoustic Velocity Inversion Based on a Convolutional Neural Network

Rapid seismic domain transfer: Seismic velocity inversion and modeling using deep generative neural networks

Accelerating 2D and 3D Frequency-Domain Seismic Wave Modeling Through Interpolating Frequency-Domain Wavefields by Deep Learning