Abstract:The recent ICRP Report 92 has noted that the current radiation weighting factor, wR, depends on the energy of the incident neutrons in a manner that differs substantially from the dependence, which results from the current convention, QL. At all neutron energies, but most conspicuously below 1 MeV, the values of wR exceed those of the effective quality factor, qE. The discrepancy is largely due to the fact that--in the absence of computed values of the effective quality factor for neutrons--wR has been patterned after the values of the ambient quality factor, which accounts insufficiently for the low-linear energy transfer (LET) gamma ray component from neutron capture in the human body. There are different options to remove the discrepancy. Option 1 is to reduce wR substantially at all neutron energies to make it equal to qE for a standard condition, such as isotropic incidence of the neutrons. Since such a reduction may cause problems in those countries where the current wR values are already legally implemented, ICRP 92 has proposed what is here termed Option 2. It recommended to replace QL by the increased value 1.6 QL - 0.6 and, accordingly, to make the radiation weighting factor equal to 1.6 qE - 0.6. With Option 2 the radiation weighting factor needs to be decreased appreciably at low neutron energies, but for fission neutron spectra the overall changes are minor. To guide--regardless which option is chosen--the selection of the numerical values, the effective quality factor, qE, is computed here for different directional distributions of neutrons incident on the anthropomorphic phantoms ADAM and EVA. None of the sex averaged numerical values is found to deviate much from those for isotropic incidence. Isotropic incidence can, thus, be used as an adequate standard condition. A numerical approximation is proposed for the standard qE that is nearly equivalent to a formula invoked by ICRP 92, but is somewhat simpler and provides realistic values of qE even for the extremely high neutron energies in space. In line with ICRP 92, it is emphasised that wR needs to be seen as a derived quantity related to the LET-dependent weighting factor.

Learning-Based Multiple Pooling Fusion in Multi-View Convolutional Neural Network for 3D Model Classification and Retrieval

Multi-view SoftPool Attention Convolutional Networks for 3D Model Classification.

Deformable convolutional networks for multi‐view 3D shape classification

OVPT: Optimal Viewset Pooling Transformer for 3D Object Recognition.

Group-pair deep feature learning for multi-view 3d model retrieval

Multi-Level View Associative Convolution Network for View-Based 3D Model Retrieval

MV-C3D: A Spatial Correlated Multi-View 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

Multi-Modal Image Fusion Via Deep Laplacian Pyramid Hybrid Network

A Multi-View Fusion Method Via Tensor Learning And Gradient Descent For Image Features

Multi-view attention-convolution pooling network for 3D point cloud classification

Learnable Graph Convolutional Network and Feature Fusion for Multi-view Learning

Joint Multi-view 2D Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Object Classification

Embedded Deep Bilinear Interactive Information and Selective Fusion for Multi-view Learning

Latent-MVCNN: 3D Shape Recognition Using Multiple Views from Pre-defined or Random Viewpoints

Deep Embedded Complementary and Interactive Information for Multi-View Classification

Multi-pooling 3D Convolutional Neural Network for fMRI Classification of Visual Brain States

3D shape classification based on convolutional neural networks fusing multi-view information

Options for the modified radiation weighting factor of neutrons.

MLVCNN: Multi-Loop-View Convolutional Neural Network for 3D Shape Retrieval

Multi-View Adaptive Fusion Network for 3D Object Detection

Cross-convolutional-layer Pooling for Generic Visual Recognition.