A Comparison of the Approaches for Gentrification Identification

Cheng Liu,Yu Deng,Weixuan Song,Qiyan Wu,Jian Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102482
IF: 6.7
2019-01-01
Cities
Abstract:Gentrification can be identified via a threshold-based method and/or a machine-learning approach. The former, which is simple and theoretically sound, is complementary to the latter, which is objective. In view of a lack of research on exploiting the strengths of both approaches, this study compares a threshold-based method to K-means clustering. Using the city of Auckland as a case study, we find that both approaches are in accord with each other. The maximum degrees of similarity (falling in the range 0-1) between the identification results of both approaches are 0.80 and 0.56 for binary and three-level identification, respectively. By comparison, it is evident that the threshold-based set of identification rules delineates gentrification more accurately. For example, a census tract with a confluence of housing reinvestment and at least one aspect of social upgrading is more likely to be identified as gentrified. Moreover, gentrification in Auckland assumes various appearances. Retaining a simple and universal conceptual and analytical framework for gentrification helps us focus on the essentials of this urban phenomenon: reinvestment and displacement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?