RARE-20. ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL FEATURES ON DEATH FROM INTRACRANIAL GERM CELL TUMORS (GCTS): ARETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Linbo Cai,Juan Li,Mingyao Lai,Cheng Zhou,Qingjun Hu,Zhaoming Zhou,Lichao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz175.943
2019-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Abstract OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to investigate the clinical features associating with intracranial germ cell tumors(GCTs) of poor prognosis. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the death data cohort based on 47 patients (30 males and 17 females) who had been diagnosed with GCTs between 2005 and 2018 in our hospital. The median age at initial diagnosis was 16 years (range, 3¬60 years). Among those, 18 patients were germinoma and 29 patients were non¬seminomatous germ-cell tumors (NGGCTs). RESULTS According to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, children aged ≤ 10 years were observed with a very short survival compared to patients aged > 10 years, indicating a 5-year survival rate of 0 and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). To be more specific, disseminated tumors were found to be the most prominent factor for prognosis in children aged ≤ 10 years: the 1-year survival for MR positive versus MR negative of disseminated tumors were 0 and 62.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the pre¬treatment serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was found to be an important surrogate for prognosis. In the subgroup of patients > 10 years, the 5-year survival for AFP > 1.5ng/ml was 25%, in comparison to 66% for AFP ≤ 1.5ng/ml (P < 0.05). Further, solid survival advantages were found in patients received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared to none. The 5¬year survival for SRS versus non-SRS patients were 62% and 29%, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our data highlights a number of critical factors that may facilitate the prognosis stratifications of GCTs. What’s more, neither the locations of the primary tumors nor the numbers of lesions are associated with the prognosis of GCTs. These results warrant further investigation via randomized prospective studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?