MNGI-09. MENINGIOMA WITH MULTIPLE DRIVERS: GENOMIC LANDSCAPE AND CLINICAL CORRELATIONS

Chang Li,Evgeniya Tyrtova,Mark Youngblood,Danielle Miyagishima,Daniel Duran,Julio Montejo,Koray Ozduman,Amar Sheth,Amy Zhao,Elena Fomchenko,Victoria Clark,Sadaf Sohrabi,Sarah Koljaka,Xuejun Li,M. Necmettiin Pamir,Timucin Avsar,Turker Kilic,Hongda Zhu,Ye Gong,Yasar Bayri,Nduka Amankulor,Kaya Bilguvar,Sacit Omay,Anita Huttner,Matthias Simon,Boris Krischek,Michel Kalamarides,Jennifer Moliterno,E. Zeynep Erson-Omay,Murat Gunel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz175.591
2019-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Previous studies have established several meningioma genomic subgroups, defined by the mutually exclusive genomic drivers. However, we distinguished a small subset of meningiomas simultaneously harboring multiple drivers from different genomic subgroups, thus referred to as “multiple-driver meningiomas”, that has not been previously investigated. We aimed to characterize the genomic landscape and clinical features of multiple-driver meningiomas. METHODS We identified 42 cases of multiple-driver meningiomas from a cohort of 3,016 cases screened for genomic drivers via molecular inversion probe sequencing (MIPS) and/or whole-exome sequencing (WES) previously in our laboratory. All driver mutations were validated via Sanger sequencing and chromosome 22 loss was accessed with qPCR. Clinical information was collected and genome-to-clinical correlations were statistically analyzed. We selected 10 multiple-driver meningioma cases for tumor-normal WES for further characterization of genomic architecture. RESULTS Multiple-driver meningiomas were significantly enriched for NF2 alteration (p< 0.001), had significantly higher WHO grade (p= 0.005) and proportion of recurrent tumors (p= 0.007) when compared with “single-driver meningiomas”, i.e. harboring driver alterations from a single genomic subgroup. Among female cases, those with multiple drivers were nearly four times more likely to be high-grade (II or III) compared to single-driver female samples (48.6% vs. 12.6%, p< 0.001). Among tumors harboring NF2 alteration, multiple-driver meningiomas demonstrated skull base predilection compared with single-driver meningiomas (50.0% vs. 27.9%, p= 0.005). WES analysis of 10 multiple-driver meningiomas identified 1p and/or 14q loss in 60% of cases. Clonality analysis revealed the presence of sub-clonal cell populations in 9 cases with all driver mutations clustered into the founding clone in 7 cases, suggesting their acquisition in the early phase of tumor development. CONCLUSION Multiple-driver meningiomas demonstrate distinct genomic and clinical features that distinguish them as clinically aggressive. They frequently occur in surgically challenging skull base locations, and are more prevalent among high-grade and recurrent cases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?