Abstract:Regular monitoring of common physiological signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, can be an effective way to either prevent or detect many kinds of chronic conditions. In particular, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a worldwide concern. According to the World Health Organization, 32% of all deaths worldwide are from CVDs. In addition, stress-related illnesses cost $190 billion in healthcare costs per year. Currently, contact devices are required to extract most of an individual's physiological information, which can be uncomfortable for users and can cause discomfort. However, in recent years, remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology is gaining interest, which enables contactless monitoring of the blood volume pulse signal using a regular camera, and ultimately can provide the same physiological information as a contact device. In this paper, we propose a benchmark comparison using a new multimodal database consisting of 56 subjects where each subject was submitted to three different tasks. Each subject wore a wearable device capable of extracting photoplethysmography signals and was filmed to allow simultaneous rPPG signal extraction. Several experiments were conducted, including a comparison between information from contact and remote signals and stress state recognition. Results have shown that in this dataset, rPPG signals were capable of dealing with motion artifacts better than contact PPG sensors and overall had better quality if compared to the signals from the contact sensor. Moreover, the statistical analysis of the variance method had shown that at least two heart-rate variability (HRV) features, NNi 20 and SAMPEN, were capable of differentiating between stress and non-stress states. In addition, three features, inter-beat interval (IBI), NNi 20, and SAMPEN, were capable of differentiating between tasks relating to different levels of difficulty. Furthermore, using machine learning to classify a "stressed" or "unstressed" state, the models were able to achieve an accuracy score of 83.11%.

Comparison of image based and laser based technique for non contact heart beat monitoring system

Non-contact Monitoring of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Based on Webcam

Automatic webcam-based human heart rate measurements using laplacian eigenmap

Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method

Remote Heart Rate Measurement from Face Videos under Realistic Situations

MOMBAT: Heart Rate Monitoring from Face Video using Pulse Modeling and Bayesian Tracking

Video-Based Heart Rate Measurement: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.

An Overview of Remote Photoplethysmography Methods for Vital Sign Monitoring

Heart Rate Detection Using an Event Camera

Non-Contact Vital Signs Monitoring Through Visible Light Sensing

Rapid, remote and low-cost finger vasculature mapping for heart rate monitoring

Automatic Contact-Less Monitoring of Breathing Rate and Heart Rate Utilizing the Fusion of mmWave Radar and Camera Steering System

Non-Contact Vision-Based Techniques of Vital Sign Monitoring: Systematic Review

Recent Progress of Optical Imaging Approaches for Noncontact Physiological Signal Measurement: A Review

Ghost imaging-based Non-contact Heart Rate Detection

Towards Human Pulse Rate Estimation from Face Video: Automatic Component Selection and Comparison of Blind Source Separation Methods

Non-contact continuous blood pressure measurement based on imaging equipment

Contactless Vital Signs Monitoring From Videos Recorded With Digital Cameras: An Overview

Spectral Reflectance based Heart Rate Measurement from Facial Video

Non-Contact Heart Rate Monitoring In Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Using Rgb Camera

Seamless Integration and Implementation of Distributed Contact and Contactless Vital Sign Monitoring