Pre‐hospital transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for transient ischaemic attack: Data from the RIGHT‐2 trial

Jason P. Appleton,Mark Dixon,Lisa J. Woodhouse,Craig S. Anderson,Sandeep Ankolekar,Lesley Cala,Timothy J. England,Peter J. Godolphin,Kailash Krishnan,Grant Mair,Keith W. Muir,John Potter,Chris I. Price,Marc Randall,Thompson G. Robinson,Christine Roffe,Peter M. Rothwell,Else Charlotte Sandset,Jeffrey L. Saver,A. Niroshan Siriwardena,Joanna M. Wardlaw,Nikola Sprigg,Philip M. Bath,the RIGHT‐2 Investigators
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16502
2024-10-13
European Journal of Neurology
Abstract:Background and purpose Ambulance trials assessing interventions in suspected stroke patients will recruit patients with currently active symptoms that will resolve into transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The safety and efficacy of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in the pre‐specified subgroup of patients with TIA in the Rapid Intervention with Glyceryl Trinitrate in Hypertensive Stroke Trial 2 (RIGHT‐2) was assessed. Methods RIGHT‐2 was a pre‐hospital‐initiated multicentre randomized sham‐controlled blinded‐endpoint trial that randomized patients with presumed ultra‐acute stroke within 4 h of symptom onset to transdermal GTN or sham. Final diagnosis was determined by site investigators. The primary outcome was a shift in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days analysed using ordinal logistic regression reported as adjusted common odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included death or dependence (mRS >2). Results In all, 109 of 1149 (9.5%) patients had a final diagnosis of TIA (GTN 57, sham 52) with mean age 73 (SD 13) years, 19 (17.4%) had pre‐morbid mRS >2, and onset to randomization was 80 min (interquartile range 49, 105). GTN lowered blood pressure by 7.4/5.2 mmHg compared with sham by hospital arrival. At day 90, GTN had no effect on shift in mRS scores (common odds ratio for increased dependence 1.47, 95% CI 0.70–3.11) but was associated with increased death or dependence (mRS >2): GTN 29 (51.8%) versus sham 23 (46.9%), odds ratio 3.86 (95% CI 1.09–13.59). Conclusions Pre‐hospital ultra‐acute transdermal GTN did not improve overall functional outcome in patients with investigator‐diagnosed TIA compared with sham treatment.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?