Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report

Mario Plebani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1402
2024-01-05
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Abstract:The final, post-analytical, phase of laboratory testing is increasingly recognized as a fundamental step in maximizing quality and effectiveness of laboratory information. There is a need to close the loop of the total testing cycle by improving upon the laboratory report, and its notification to users. The harmonization of the post-analytical phase is somewhat complicated, mainly because it calls for communication that involves parties speaking different languages, including laboratorians, physicians, information technology specialists, and patients. Recently, increasing interest has been expressed in integrated diagnostics, defined as convergence of imaging, pathology, and laboratory tests with advanced information technology (IT). In particular, a common laboratory, radiology and pathology diagnostic reporting system that integrates text, sentinel images and molecular diagnostic data to an integrated, coherent interpretation enhances management decisions and improves quality of care.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problems in the last stage of the laboratory testing process - the post - analysis stage. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to improve the quality and effectiveness of laboratory information by improving laboratory reports and the way they are notified to users. The optimization of this stage is regarded as one of the key opportunities to improve the overall quality of laboratory medicine. However, since it involves communication among multiple parties (such as laboratory personnel, doctors, information technology experts and patients) who use different professional languages, the coordination and unification in the post - analysis stage is a complex challenge. In addition, the paper also emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnosis, that is, combining imaging, pathology and laboratory tests with advanced information technology to provide a comprehensive and coherent interpretation, thereby enhancing management decisions and improving the quality of medical care. The paper points out that laboratory reports are not only a simple presentation of data, but also need to contain other parameters that can make the data "actionable", such as terms, measurement units, reference values, decision limits and explanatory comments, etc. These additional pieces of information are crucial for transforming raw data into useful clinical information, because it is these pieces of information that influence the clinical reasoning and decision - making process. To achieve this goal, the paper proposes some key requirements, such as that laboratory reports should at least contain patient identity, sample reception time, measurement units, reference intervals and/or clinical decision limits, drug treatment ranges and, when necessary, explanatory comments, etc. In conclusion, this paper aims to explore how to improve the effect of the post - analysis stage by optimizing the content and form of laboratory reports, so as to better support clinical decision - making and patient management.