Study of condensable particulate matter from stationary combustion sources: Source profiles, emissions, and impact on ambient fine particulate matter
Huanhuan Tong,Yangjun Wang,Ling Huang,Qingfang Su,Xin Yi,Hehe Zhai,Sen Jiang,Hanqing Liu,Jiaqiang Liao,Li Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176222
2024-09-18
Abstract:Although significant progress has been made in controlling emissions from stationary combustion sources in China over the past decade, understanding of condensable particulate matter (CPM) emissions from these sources and their impact on ambient PM2.5 remains limited. In this study, we established the source profiles and emission inventories of CPM from coal-fired industrial boilers (CFIBs), coal-fired power plants (CFPPs), and iron and steel industry (ISIs) for the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region of China; furthermore, the air quality model (Community Multiscale Air Quality, CMAQ) was used to evaluate the impact of CPM emissions from these three types of stationary combustion sources on ambient PM2.5 during Feb. 2018, a month characterized by elevated PM2.5 concentrations. The results indicated that CPM emissions from these three sources in the YRD region before and after the implementation of the ultra-low emissions (ULE) policy amounted to 109,839 and 43,338 tons, respectively, with particularly high emission intensity along the Yangtze River. The implementation of CFPPs ULE policy was shown to reduce the impact of CPM emissions from these three stationary sources on monthly PM2.5 concentrations from 0.92 μg/m3 to 0.41 μg/m3 (with a maximum of 5.35 μg/m3). This reduction exceeded the 0.31 μg/m3 decrease in PM2.5 concentrations resulting from the emission reductions of conventional pollutants (FPM, SO2 and NOx). CPM emissions from these three stationary sources were found to increase the PM2.5 by 0.68 μg/m3 during pollution periods. The largest components of PM2.5 contributed by CPM emissions from stationary combustion sources were sulfate, organic carbon, and nitrate, accounting for 21.4 %, 21.1 %, and 18.2 %, respectively. Particularly, contributions from CPM emissions to PM2.5 varied by altitude, with a relatively large impact at altitudes between 220 and 460 m. Attention should be given to CPM emission control, with particular priority placed on implementing ULE measures for ISIs and CFIBs.