Abstract:Identifying critical safety management drivers with high driver-level risks is essential for traffic safety improvement. Previous studies commonly evaluated driver-level risks based upon aggregated statistical characteristics (e.g., driving exposure and driving behavior), which were obtained from long-period driving monitoring data. However, given the great advancements of the connected vehicle and in-vehicle data instrumentation technologies, there has been a notable increase in the collection of short-period driving data, which has emerged as a prominent data source for analysis. In this data environment, traditionally employed aggregated behavior characteristics are unstable due to the time-varying feature of driving behavior coupled with insufficient data sampling periods. Thus, traditional modeling methods based upon aggregated statistical characteristics are no longer feasible. Instead of utilizing such unreliable statistical information to represent driver-level risks, this study employed temporal variation characteristics of driving behavior to identify critical safety management drivers in the short-period driving data environment. Specifically, the relationships between driving behavior temporal variation characteristics and individual crash occurrence probability were developed. To eliminate the impacts of drivers' driving behavior heterogeneity on model performance, "traffic entropy" index that could quantify the abnormal degrees of driving behavior was proposed. Deep learning models including convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) were employed to conduct the temporal variation feature mining. Empirical analyses were conducted using data obtained from online ride-hailing services. Experiment results showed that temporal variation characteristics based models outperformed traditional aggregated statistical characteristics based models. The area under the curve (AUC) index was improved by 4.1%. And the proposed traffic entropy index further enhanced the model performance by 5.3%. The best model achieved an AUC of 0.754, comparable to existing approaches utilizing long-period driving data. Finally, applications of the proposed method in driver management program development and its further investigations have been discussed.

Objective and Subjective Analysis to Quantify Influence Factors of Driving Risk

Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis

Unified Quantitative Method of Driving Risk by Comprehensive Considering Driver-Vehicle-Road Factors

A Multimodal Data-Driven Approach for Driving Risk Assessment

A Driving Risk Surrogate and Its Application in Car-Following Scenario at Expressway

Driving Risk Assessment Using Cluster Analysis Based on Naturalistic Driving Data

Integrated driving risk surrogate model and car-following behavior for freeway risk assessment

A traffic dynamic operation risk assessment method using driving behaviors and traffic flow Data: An empirical analysis

Differed Risk Perception in Manual and Automated Driving: an Empirical Study of Varied Conditions

Comprehensive Evaluation of Freeway Driving Risks Based on Fuzzy Logic

An empirical investigation of driver car-following risk evolution using naturistic driving data and random parameters multinomial logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances

Quantitative indicator of homeostatic risk perception in car following

A Novel Road Traffic Risk Modeling Approach Based on the Traffic Safety Field Concept

Driving risk identification of urban arterial and collector roads based on multi-scale data

Critical safety management driver identification based upon temporal variation characteristics of driving behavior

Real-time driving risk assessment based on the psycho-physical field

A Quantitative Method of Assessing the Hazard Perception of Drivers in Human–Machine Codriving Vehicles

A dynamic driving-style analysis method based on drivers' interaction with surrounding vehicles

Quantifying the Individual Differences of Driver' Risk Perception with Just Four Interpretable Parameters

A multinomial logit model: Safety risk analysis of interchange area based on aggregate driving behavior data

Estimating Risk Levels of Driving Scenarios through Analysis of Driving Styles for Autonomous Vehicles