Effects of Yeast Autolysate in the Practical Diet on the Growth Performance, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance of Pacific White Shrimp.

Shuoli Ma,Xiaoxia Wang,Weihua Gao,Weiqi Xu,Wenbing Zhang,Kangsen Mai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aah.10095
2019-01-01
Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
Abstract:The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of supplementing the practical diet with yeast autolysate (YA) on the growth performance, immunity, and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimpLitopenaeus vannamei. Four isonitrogenous and isolipidic practical diets were formulated. The relatively high-fish-meal control diet contained 25% fish meal withoutYAsupplementation (E1). The other control diet contained 20% fish meal withoutYA(E2). With the E2 diet as the basis, two additional experimental diets were created by further supplementation with 1%YA(E3) and 2%YA(E4). The shrimp (initial weight: 0.30 +/- 0.02 g) were fed with the four experimental diets for 8 weeks and then challenged withVibrio parahaemolyticus. The results indicated that there were no significant differences in survival rate (SR) or feed intake (FI) among these groups. The weight gain rate (WGR) of group E1 was not significantly different from that of groups E3 and E4. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) in group E4 was lower than that of group E2, and group E4 had the highest protein efficiency ratio (PER). The total hemocyte counts (THC) and lysozyme activities in group E3 and group E4 were significantly higher than those of the other groups. Group E3 had the highest respiratory burst (RB). AfterV. parahaemolyticusadministration, group E3 and group E4 had significantly lower cumulative mortalities than group E1 did. In conclusion, the 20% fish meal diet withoutYAsupplementation (E2) yielded a significantly lower growth rate than the 25% fish meal diet withoutYAsupplementation (E1) did. Furthermore, the Pacific white shrimp that received dietary supplementation with 1%YAdemonstrated improved growth rate, immune response, and resistance to theV. parahaemolyticuschallenge compared with those that were fed the 20% fish meal diet withoutYAsupplementation (E2).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?