Abstract:The aim of this study was to compare the mortality outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) assisted by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) + invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with historical controls. From January 1, 2016 to June 1, 2017, 60 patients were retrospectively enrolled at Tianjin Chest Hospital. Out of these, 88.3% of patients achieved thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 after PCI. The all-cause mortality rate in-hospital and at 1 year was 25% (95% CI: 0.14–0.36) and 33.9% (0.22–0.46), respectively. A systematic review followed by meta-analysis was performed with 4 historical studies of patients treated by PCI + IMV with partial IABP, which found an in-hospital mortality rate of 66.0% (95% CI: 0.62–0.71). Recently, a meta-analysis of patients receiving PCI + IABP with partial IMV showed that the 1 year mortality rate was 52.2% (95% CI: 0.47–0.58). In Cox regression analysis of patient data from the current study, lactic acid level ≥4.5 mmol/L, hyperuricemia, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3 were independent predictors of death at 1 year. All-cause mortality, in-hospital and at 1 year, in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock treated with PCI + IABP and IMV was lower than in those treated with PCI + partial IABP or IMV. Larger, longer-term direct comparisons are warranted.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Assisted by Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: Retrospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analyses.