Genome-Wide Analysis of the FABP Gene Family in Liver of Chicken (Gallus gallus): Identification,Dynamic Expression Profile, and RegulatoryMechanism.

Zhang Wang,Ya-Xin Yue,Zi-Ming Liu,Li-Yu Yang,Hong Li,Zhuan-Jian Li,Guo-Xi Li,Yan-Bin Wang,Ya-Dong Tian,Xiang-Tao Kang,Xiao-Jun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235948
IF: 5.6
2019-01-01
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Abstract:The fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) gene family, which encodes a group of fatty acid-trafficking molecules that affect cellular functions, has been studied extensively in mammals. However, little is known about the gene structure, expression profile, and regulatory mechanism of the gene family in chickens. In the present study, bioinformatics-based methods were used to identify the family members and investigate their evolutionary history and features of gene structure. Real-time PCR combined with in vivo and in vitro experiments were used to examine the spatiotemporal expression pattern, and explore the regulatory mechanism of FABP genes. The results show that nine members of the FABP gene family, which branched into two clusters and shared a conserved FATTYACIDBP domain, exist in the genome of chickens. Of these, seven FABP genes, including FABP1, FABP3-7, and FABP10 were abundantly expressed in the liver of hens. The expression levels of FABP1, FABP3, and FABP10 were significantly increased, FABP5 and FABP7 were significantly decreased, and FABP4 and FABP6 remained unchanged in hens at the peak laying stage in comparison to those at the pre-laying stage. Transcription of FABP1 and FABP3 were activated by estrogen via estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, whilst FABP10 was activated by estrogen via ER beta. Meanwhile, the expression of FABP1 was regulated by peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) isoforms, of which tested PPAR alpha and PPAR beta agonists significantly inhibited the expression of FABP1, while tested PPAR gamma agonists significantly increased the expression of FABP1, but downregulated it when the concentration of the PPAR gamma agonist reached 100 nM. The expression of FABP3 was upregulated via tested PPAR beta and PPAR gamma agonists, and the expression of FABP7 was selectively promoted via PPAR gamma. The expression of FABP10 was activated by all of the three tested PPAR agonists, but the expression of FABP4-6 was not affected by any of the PPAR agonists. In conclusion, members of the FABP gene family in chickens shared similar functional domains, gene structures, and evolutionary histories with mammalian species, but exhibited varying expression profiles and regulatory mechanisms. The results provide a valuable resource for better understanding the biological functions of individual FABP genes in chickens.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?