Automated traffic monitoring of Neurosurgical Operating Room

Mathea Schafer,Heather Dixon,Katie Palladino,Sara Baumann,Jeremy Martinson,Monica Bolland,Marilyn Lakdawala,Mohamed Yassin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.01.016

IF: 4.303

2024-01-28

American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract:Background Operating room (OR) traffic disrupts airflow and increases particle count, which predisposes patients to surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly in longer surgeries with hardware placement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of traffic during neurosurgical procedures, as well as reasons for and perceptions of OR traffic. Methods This is a single center, multi-method study monitoring neurosurgical OR traffic through direct observation, automated monitoring, and interviews. Traffic was observed between skin incision and closure. Personal interviews with OR teams including surgeons, anesthesia, and nurses were conducted to evaluate their perceptions of the frequency of OR traffic and reasons for OR traffic. Results Direct observation reported OR door opening an average of 18 times, with 20 people entering or exiting per hour. The exact reason for traffic was not verified in all traffic cases and was able to be confirmed in only a third of the cases. Automated monitoring resulted in an average of 31 people entering or exiting the OR per hour. The procedure length was significantly associated with the number of people entering or exiting the OR per hour (p < 0.0001). Interviews highlighted that OR teams reported traffic to be significantly lower than observed and automated monitoring results, with approximately < 6 people entering or exiting per hour. Conclusions OR traffic is higher than staff expected, and updated processes are required to reduce the number of times the OR door opens. Implementing automated observation of OR traffic could reduce the OR traffic and the risk for SSI.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health