Abstract:Problem definition: This paper considers a socially responsible supply chain that consists of a manufacturer and a retailer, who concern their respective profits as well as consumer welfare. Each firm’s objective is modelled as a weighted sum of its profit and consumer surplus, with the weight on consumer surplus representing the CSR level of the firm. As a social planner, the government seeks to optimize social welfare by adopting subsidy policies considering the interactive decisions of the supply chain members. Methodology/results: We examine two typical supply chain structures: in the “push system,” the manufacturer first determines the wholesale price and then the retailer determines the order quantity; in the “pull system,” the retailer first determines the wholesale price and then the manufacturer determines the production quantity. We derive the optimal decisions under each supply chain structure and investigate the impact of the firms’ CSR levels on the interactive decisions of the supply chain members and the overall performance of the supply chain. Furthermore, we examine two types of intervention policies (i.e., subsidizing firms and subsidizing consumers) from the government’s perspective. Managerial Implications: We show that in a push supply chain, a higher level of retailer’s CSR concern does not necessarily lead to higher consumer surplus because its concern on consumers can be exploited by the manufacturer to improve the profit. Furthermore, the manufacturer’s CSR concern may not benefit the retailer’s profit, especially when the CSR level is relatively low. Nevertheless, compared to the for-profit supply chain, concern on consumer surplus can be beneficial to both firms’ profits as well as consumer surplus, inducing a “win-win-win” situation under certain conditions. To induce social welfare maximization by subsidizing firms, government’s quantity-based subsidy is always more cost-effective than sales based subsidy. As the firms become more socially responsible or the demand uncertainty becomes lower, subsidizing consumers can achieve higher social welfare than subsidizing firms.

Research on the Optimal Operational Strategy of Enterprise Considering Social Responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

The Realization of Corporate Social Responsibility:Its Mechanism Construction and Analysis

On Demand and Supply of Social Responsibility of Enterprises

Relation between Social Responsibility and Enterprise Long-term Competitiveness

A coordination mechanism through value‐added profit distribution in a supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

The Impact of Supply Chain Social Responsibility on Sustainable Performance

Research on the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior on Financial Performance from the Perspective of Optimal Differentiation

Study on the Relationship Between CSR and Enterprise Performance Form the Perspective of Fit Theory

NON-COOPERATIVE TWO-ECHELON SUPPLY CHAINS WITH A FOCUS ON SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Supply Chain Models with Mutual Commitments and Implications for Social Responsibility

Social Responsibility Allocation in Two-Echelon Supply Chains: Insights from Wholesale Price Contracts

Green supply chain management for operational performance: anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital

Managing Social Responsibility in Multitier Supply Chains

Security Strategy Optimization and Algorithm Based on 3D Economic Sustainable Supply Chain

A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains

Socially Responsible Supply Chains and Subsidy Policies

Socially Responsible Supply Chain Partnership Based-On CSR Equity Model

Impact of corporate social responsibility on carbon emission reduction in supply chains

Productivity Dilemma of Chinese Labor-intensive Manufacturing Enterprises:From the Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility

Optimal strategies for product price, customer environmental volunteering, and corporate environmental responsibility