Abstract:Sparsity-based subspace clustering algorithms have attracted significant attention thanks to their excellent performance in practical applications. A prominent example is the sparse subspace clustering (SSC) algorithm by Elhamifar and Vidal, which performs spectral clustering based on an adjacency matrix obtained by sparsely representing each data point in terms of all the other data points via the Lasso. When the number of data points is large or the dimension of the ambient space is high, the computational complexity of SSC quickly becomes prohibitive. Dyer et al. observed that SSC-orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) obtained by replacing the Lasso by the greedy OMP algorithm results in significantly lower computational complexity, while often yielding comparable performance. The central goal of this paper is an analytical performance characterization of SSC-OMP for noisy data. Moreover, we introduce and analyze the SSC-matching pursuit (MP) algorithm, which employs MP in lieu of OMP. Both SSC-OMP and SSC-MP are proven to succeed even when the subspaces intersect and when the data points are contaminated by severe noise. The clustering conditions we obtain for SSC-OMP and SSC-MP are similar to those for SSC and for the thresholding-based subspace clustering (TSC) algorithm due to Heckel and Bölcskei. Analytical results in combination with numerical results indicate that both SSC-OMP and SSC-MP with a data-dependent stopping criterion automatically detect the dimensions of the subspaces underlying the data. Experiments on synthetic and on real data show that SSC-MP often matches or exceeds the performance of the computationally more expensive SSC-OMP algorithm. Moreover, SSC-MP compares very favorably to SSC, TSC, and the nearest subspace neighbor algorithm, both in terms of clustering performance and running time. In addition, we find that, in contrast to SSC-OMP, the performance of SSC-MP is very robust with respect to the choice of parameters in the stopping criteria.

Non-negative Sparse Subspace Clustering by Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Non-Negative Local Sparse Coding for Subspace Clustering

Active Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Sparse Subspace Clustering

An Expression-Reinforced Sparse Subspace Clustering by Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Penalized Nonnegative Nonnegative Matrix Tri-Factorization For Co-Clustering

A New Sparse Subspace Clustering by Rotated Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Orthogonal Matching Pursuit with Adaptive Restriction for Sparse Subspace Clustering

Restricted Connection Orthogonal Matching Pursuit For Sparse Subspace Clustering.

A Nonconvex Implementation of Sparse Subspace Clustering: Algorithm and Convergence Analysis

Sparse subspace clustering based on L0 constraint

Sparse Subspace Clustering With One-Way Selective Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Nonnegative Matrix Factorization on Orthogonal Subspace

Greedy Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Subspace Clustering to Improve Graph Connectivity.

Noisy Subspace Clustering via Matching Pursuits

Scalable Sparse Subspace Clustering by Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Non-Negative Sparse Semantic Coding for Text Categorization

Scaled Simplex Representation for Subspace Clustering

Subspace Clustering Guided Convex Nonnegative Matrix Factorization.

Non-negative and Sparse Spectral Clustering

Kernel Sparse Subspace Clustering on Symmetric Positive Definite Manifolds

Data-Dependent Sparsity for Subspace Clustering.