MA13.11 A Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin-Polymeric Micelle Paclitaxel vs Cisplatin-Solvent-Based Paclitaxel in 1st Line Advanced NSCLC

Y. Wu,B. Han,M. Shi,H. Tu,A. Gu,C. Huang,H. Wang,Z. Yu,X. Wang,L. Cao,Y. Shu,R. Yang,X. Li,J. Chang,Y. Hu,P. Shen,Z. Guo,M. Tao,Y. Zhang,X. Liu,Q. Sun,X. Zhang,Z. Jiang,J. Zhao,F. Chen,J. Sun,D. Li,J. Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.609
IF: 20.121
2019-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Cisplatin-sb-Pac is the one of current standard of chemotherapy in aNSCLC, It produced 15% to 32% objective response rate (ORR) and 7.9 to 10.6 months of median overall survival (OS). Alternative nab-paclitaxel to sb-Pac only increased ORR but not improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Thus the unmet medical need for new chemo regimen remains. From May 2015 to Jan 2018 448 untreated patients (pts) with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC from 24 sites were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 230 mg/m2 pm-Pac and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle, and then dose escalation of pm-Pac to 300 mg/m2 from the second cycle if no prespecified toxic effects observed or 175 mg/m2 sb-Pac plus cisplatin 70 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. Pts were stratified by stage and histology. The primary end point was ORR by Independent review committee (IRC) and Investigator (INV) in the intent-to-treat population. The second endpoints included PFS, OS and safety. Data cutoff was Jan 26, 2019. 300 pts were assigned to pm-Pac and 148 to sb-Pac. Baseline characteristic were balance in both arms. Nonsquamous carcinoma (non-squ) and stage IV were 57.3% and 81.0% in pm-Pac and 58.1% and 81.8% in sb-Pac respectively. 73.2% pts in pm-Pac arm escalated their dose to 300mg/m2, 0.7% down to 184mg/m2. ORR and PFS in pm-Pac were significantly better than that in sb-Pac (table 1). OS was immature. For histology subgroup the ORR was 58.6% v 37.1% (P=0.0054) in squamous carcinoma (Squ) and 44.2% v 18.6% (P<0.0001) in non-squ. Grade ≥3 AEs was 80.0% for pm-Pac and 79.7% for sb-Pac. No new safety issues were identified. The phase 3 trial met its primary endpoint. pm-Pac significantly improved ORR and PFS than sb-Pac, and pm-Pac regimen should be a new standard chemo for aNSCLC. (NCT 02667743).TabEfficacies comparison between pm-Pac and sb-Pacpm-Pacsb-PacP valueORR % (95% CI)IRC INV50.3 (44.5-56.1) 52.0 (46.2-57.8)26.4 (19.5-34.2) 28.4 (21.3-36.4)<0.0001 <0.0001PFS (months)6.4 (6.2-6.9)5.3 (4.6-6.0)HR 0.66 (0.52-0.84), P=0.0006OS at 12 months67.3%61.8%- Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?