Abstract:Kleinberg proposed a family of small-world networks to explain the navigability of large-scale real-world social networks. However, the underlying mechanism that drives real networks to be navigable is not yet well understood. In this paper, we present a game theoretic model for the formation of navigable small world networks. We model the network formation as a Distance-Reciprocity Balanced (DRB) game in which people seek for both high reciprocity and long-distance relationships. We show that the game has only two Nash equilibria: One is the navigable small-world network, and the other is the random network in which each node connects with each other node with equal probability. We further show that the navigable small world is very stable --- (a) no collusion of any size would benefit from deviating from it; and (b) after an arbitrary deviations of a large random set of nodes, the network would return to the navigable small world as soon as every node takes one best-response step. In contrast, for the random network, a small group collusion or random perturbations is guaranteed to move the network to the navigable network as soon as every node takes one best-response step. Moreover, we show that navigable small world has much better social welfare than the random network, and provide the price-of-anarchy and price-of-stability results of the game. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that the system always converges to the navigable network even when limited or no information about other players' strategies is available, and the DRB game simulated on the real-world network leads to navigability characteristic that is very close to that of the real network. Our theoretical and empirical analyses provide important new insight on the connection between distance, reciprocity and navigability in social networks.

Heterogeneous Donation Game in Geographical Small-World Networks

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games

Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Evolutionary Cooperation in Networked Public Goods Game with Dependency Groups.

Promotion of Cooperation Induced by Nonuniform Payoff Allocation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Evolutionary Snowdrift Game on Heterogeneous Newman–Watts Small-World Network

Evolutionary Prisoner ’ s Dilemma on heterogeneous

Small world yields optimal public goods in presence of both altruistic and selfish cooperators

Cooperative Dynamics of Snowdrift Game on Spatial Distance-Dependent Small-World Networks

Asymmetric cost in snowdrift game on scale-free networks

Evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma on heterogeneous Newman-Watts small-world network

Limitation of network inhomogeneity in improving cooperation in coevolutionary dynamics

Cooperation and Coordination in Heterogeneous Populations with Interaction Diversity.

Enhancement of cooperation by giving high-degree neighbors more help

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

Heterogeneous investment promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game on hypergraphs

Dynamical Organization of Cooperation on Homogeneous Networked System.

Effect of Heterogeneous Sub-Populations on the Evolution of Cooperation

The spatial public goods game on hypergraphs with heterogeneous investment

A Game Theoretic Model for the Formation of Navigable Small-World Networks --- the Tradeoff between Distance and Reciprocity