Genetic relatedness and antimicrobial resistance in respiratory bacteria from beef calves sampled from spring processing to 40 days after feedlot entry

Yongmei Guo,Christopher McMullen,Edouard Timsit,Jennyka Hallewell,Karin Orsel,Frank van der Meer,Sumei Yan,Trevor W. Alexander
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108478
IF: 3.246
2020-01-01
Veterinary Microbiology
Abstract:Recent studies have shown an increase in antimicrobial-resistant bovine respiratory disease (BRD) pathogens. To investigate the origin of antimicrobial resistance in the respiratory microbiota of beef cattle, three groups (A, B, or C) of 40 calves sourced from different calf-ranches were sampled by deep nasopharyngeal swab (DNS) at the time of first on-ranch vaccination (Time point 1, T1), feedlot entry (Time point 2, T2), and 40 days after feedlot entry (Time point 3, T3; feedlots differed by group). Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni were isolated from DNS samples, tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, and subtyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Antimicrobial resistance genes [tet(H), tet(W), and sul2] were also quantified in DNS metagenomic DNA using PCR. Prevalence of calves positive for BRD pathogens differed among groups and time-points but P. multocida was the most prevalent (61% of calves positive, at least, at one timepoint), followed by M. haemolytica (48%) and H. somni (26%). Most M. haemolytica were susceptible to all antimicrobials (88.6%; n = 70). For P. multocida, the dominant resistance phenotype was against oxytetracycline and neomycin (35.8%). Resistant P. multocida isolates were mainly detected in group C at T3 and had the same PFGE profile. For H. somni, the dominant resistance phenotype was against neomycin (63.3%) and was only observed at T3. The abundance of tet(W) did not change significantly over time (P > 0.05). Abundances of tet (H) and sul2 only increased for group C at T3 (P < 0.05). Overall, this study showed that resistance in the respiratory microbiota of beef calves can increase from calf-ranch to feedlot however, the results can vary by calf-ranch and feedlot.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?