Abstract:Background: Research with college students has supported a model of writing approaches that defines the relationship between a writer and writing task along a deep and surface process continuum (Biggs, 1988). Based on that model, Lavelle (1993) developed the Inventory of Processes in College Composition which reflects students' motives and strategies as related to writing outcomes. It is also important to define the approaches of secondary students to better understand writing processes at that level, and development in written composition. Aims: This study was designed to define the writing approaches of secondary students by factor analysing students' responses to items regarding writing beliefs and writing strategies, and to compare the secondary approaches to those of college students. A related goal was to explore the relationships of the secondary writing approaches to perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), writing preferences, and writing outcomes. Samples: The initial, factor analytic phase involved 398 junior level high school students (11th grade) enrolled in a mandatory language arts class at each of three large Midwestern high schools (USA). Then, 49 junior level students enrolled in two language arts classes participated as subjects in the second phase. Method: Classroom teachers administered the Inventory of Processes in College Composition (Lavelle, 1993), which contained 72 true-or-false items regarding writing beliefs and strategies, during regular class periods. Data were factor analysed and the structure compared to that of college students. In the second phase, the new inventory, Inventory of Processes in Secondary Composition, was administered in conjunction with the Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Writing Inventory (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), and a writing preferences survey. A writing sample and grade in Language Arts classes were obtained and served as outcome variables. Results: The factor structure of secondary writing reflected three process dimensions. The first factor, Elaborative-Expressive, describes a writing strategy based on personal investment and audience concern. The second factor, Planful-Procedural, denotes sticking to a plan, following the rules, and 'preparing' for writing. Achieving-Competitive, the third factor, reflects a 'teacher pleasing' strategy or doing only what needs to be done to get a good grade. Two factors from the college model, Elaborative and Procedural, were replicated, and two were not, Reflective-Revision and Low Self-Efficacy. Regression analyses supported that the processes in writing under a timed condition are different from those used when writing over time, and that students' perceptions of writing self-regulatory efficacy were predictive of writing success under both conditions.

Do Secondary School-Leaving English Examination Results Predict University Students’ Academic Writing Performance? A Latent Profile Analysis

Hong Kong Secondary Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Strategy Use and English Writing: Influences of Motivational Beliefs

Self-efficacy, Task Values and Growth Mindset: What Has the Most Predictive Power for Primary School Students’ Self-Regulated Learning in English Writing and Writing Competence in an Asian Confucian Cultural Context?

An Analysis on Writing Competence of English Majors

Exploring General Versus Academic English Proficiency as Predictors of Adolescent EFL Essay Writing

The English Learning Motivation of Chinese Secondary School Students: Cross-grade Survey Analysis

ASSESSING THE ACADEMIC WRITING SKILLS OF FINAL YEAR ENGLISH SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL) EDUCATIONS STUDENTS TO DETERMINE THEIR PREPAREDNESS AS LANGUAGE TEACHERS: A PRACTICAL APPROACH AT A UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Quantitative Analysis of Academic Writing As to Informality and Vocabulary Features.

Assessing L2 Secondary Student Writing Feedback Literacy and Its Predictive Effect on Their L2 Writing Performance

Writing in a second language based on cross-linguistic sources: The language use among undergraduates in Hong Kong

How Did Taiwanese Undergraduate Students Perceive Their English Reading and Writing Abilities?

A latent profile analysis of L2 writing emotions and their relations to writing buoyancy, motivation and proficiency

Same Language, Different Functions: A Cross-Genre Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

College Students' EFL Writing Anxiety and Self-efficacy and Their Prediction on Students' Writing Performance

Secondary Students’ L2 Writing Motivation and Engagement: the Impact of Teachers’ Instructional Approaches and Feedback Practices

Second Language Learners’ Family Background and Their English Writing Competence: The Case of a Private Tertiary Institution in Ghana

Unpacking the impact of teacher assessment approaches on student writing engagement: a survey of university learners across different languages

The writing approaches of secondary students

College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language

Exploring Hong Kong primary students’ English writing motivation: relationships between writing self-efficacy and task value

How University EFL Writers’ Beliefs in Writing Ability Impact Their Perceptions of Peer Assessment: Perspectives from Implicit Theories of Intelligence