Ecophysiological variables retrieval and early stress detection: insights from a synthetic spatial scaling exercise
Javier Pacheco-Labrador,M.Pilar Cendrero-Mateo,Shari Van Wittenberghe,Itza Hernandez-Sequeira,Gerbrand Koren,Egor Prikaziuk,Szilvia Fóti,Enrico Tomelleri,Kadmiel Maseyk,Nataša Čereković,Rosario Gonzalez-Cascon,Zbyněk Malenovsky,Mar Albert-Saiz,Michal Antala,János Balogh,Henning Buddenbaum,Mohammad Hossain Dehghan-Shoar,Joseph T. Fennell,Jean-Baptiste Feret,Hamadou Balde,Miriam Machwitz,Ádám Mészáros,Guofang Miao,Miguel Morata,Paul Naethe,Zoltán Nagy,Krisztina Pintér,R. Reddy Pullanagari,Anshu Rastogi,Bastian Siegmann,Sheng Wang,Chenhui Zhang,Daniel Kopkáně
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2024.2414435
IF: 3.531
2024-10-30
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Abstract:The ability to access physiologically driven signals, such as surface temperature, photochemical reflectance index (PRI), and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), through remote sensing (RS) are exciting developments for vegetation studies. Accessing this ecophysiological information requires considering processes operating at scales from the top-of-the-canopy to the photosystems, adding complexity compared to reflectance index-based approaches. To investigate the maturity and knowledge of the growing RS community in this area, COST Action CA17134 SENSECO organized a Spatial Scaling Challenge (SSC). Challenge participants were asked to retrieve four key ecophysiological variables for a field each of maize and wheat from a simulated field campaign: leaf area index (LAI), leaf chlorophyll content ( C ab ), maximum carboxylation rate ( V cmax,25 ), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). The simulated campaign data included hyperspectral optical, thermal and SIF imagery, together with ground sampling of the four variables. Non-parametric methods that combined multiple spectral domains and field measurements were used most often, thereby indirectly performing the top-of-the-canopy to photosystem scaling. LAI and C ab were reliably retrieved in most cases, whereas V cmax,25 and NPQ were less accurately estimated and demanded information ancillary to RS imagery. The factors considered least by participants were the biophysical and physiological canopy vertical profiles, the spatial mismatch between RS sensors, the temporal mismatch between field sampling and RS acquisition, and measurement uncertainty. Furthermore, few participants developed NPQ maps into stress maps or provided a deeper analysis of their parameter retrievals. The SSC shows that, despite advances in statistical and physically based models, the vegetation RS community should improve how field and RS data are integrated and scaled in space and time. We expect this work will guide newcomers and support robust advances in this research field.
imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing