Stabilities, Electronic Structures, and Bonding Properties of Iron Complexes (e1e2)fe(co)2(cnartripp2)2 (E1E2=BF, CO, N2, CN−, or NO+)**
Gerui Pei,Pei Zhao,Song Xu,Xintian Zhao,Chuncai Kong,Zhimao Yang,Masahiro Ehara,Tao Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/open.202000248
2020-01-01
ChemistryOpen
Abstract:Abstract The coordination of 10‐electron diatomic ligands (BF, CO N2) to iron complexes Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 [ArTripp2=2,6‐(2,4,6‐(iso‐propyl)3C6H2)2C6H3] have been realized in experiments very recently (Science, 2019, 363, 1203–1205). Herein, the stability, electronic structures, and bonding properties of (E1E2)Fe‐(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 (E1E2=BF, CO, N2, CN−, NO+) were studied using density functional (DFT) calculations. The ground state of all those molecules is singlet and the calculated geometries are in excellent agreement with the experimental values. The natural bond orbital analysis revealed that Fe is negatively charged while E1 possesses positive charges. By employing the energy decomposition analysis, the bonding nature of the E2E1–Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 bond was disclosed to be the classic dative bond E2E1→Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 rather than the electron‐sharing double bond. More interestingly, the bonding strength between BF and Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 is much stronger than that between CO (or N2) and Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2, which is ascribed to the better σ‐donation and π back‐donations. However, the orbital interactions in CN−→Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 and NO+→Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 mainly come from σ‐donation and π back‐donation, respectively. The different contributions from σ donation and π donation for different ligands can be well explained by using the energy levels of E1E2 and Fe(CO)2(CNArTripp2)2 fragments.