The association of husbands' smoking with wives' dysglycemia status: A cross-sectional study among over 10 million Chinese women aged 20-49

Minjin Zhang,Ying Yang,Fangchao Liu,Jiajing Jia,Qin Xu,Long Wang,Yuanyuan Wang,Yuan He,Ya Zhang,Zuoqi Peng,Qiaomei Wang,Haiping Shen,Zongyu Xu,Yiping Zhang,Donghai Yan,Hongguang Zhang,Xu Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13009
IF: 4.53
2020-01-01
Journal of Diabetes
Abstract:Background We comprehensively evaluated the association between husbands' smoking amount and wives' dysglycemia status. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study which recruited 12 023 714 reproductive couples who participated in the National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project (NFPCP) between 2015 and 2016 in China. Multivariable logistic models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analysis and stratified analysis were further performed to investigate potential effect modification. Results Compared to the neither-smoker group, the multivariable-adjusted ORs for diabetes mellitus (DM) among women was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.07-1.10), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.87-1.23), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41) in the husband-smoker, wife-smoker, and both-smokers groups, respectively. An increased risk of DM was also observed for women whose husbands smoke 1 to 10 (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07), 11 to 20 (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15), and over 20 cigarettes per day (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.31). The prevalence of wives' DM showed significant linear trends with husbands' smoking amount (P-for trend < .001). A similar growth tendency was also observed between husband smoking amount and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) prevalence with ORs of 1.04 (95% CI, 1.04-1.05), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.04-1.06), and 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06-1.11) for 1-10, 11-20, and over 20 cigarettes per day, respectively. The relationship between husbands' smoking amount and wives' IFG/DM prevalence appear to be modified by body mass index (BMI). Conclusions This study shows significant relationships between husbands' smoking and wives' risk of IFG/DM, and this result exists in both a categorical and dose-response manner. This association is modified by BMI. Family-oriented smoking interventions may both reduce husbands' active smoking and wives' risk of DM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?