The Effectiveness of Transitional Care Interventions on Health Care Utilization in Patients Discharged From the Hospital With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuan Li,Biru Luo,Minlu Li,Hong Zheng,Jinbo Fang,Mei R. Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.019
IF: 7.802
2021-03-01
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>Heart failure (HF) heavily burdens the global health system. Transitional care interventions attempt to streamline the hospital-to-home transition to ease the burden. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transitional care interventions on health care utilization after hospitalization for HF.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis including dose-response relationship.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Setting and Participants</h3><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of transitional care interventions vs usual care in older patients discharged from the hospital with HF.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, were systematically searched from January 2009 to October 2019 to locate relevant systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The original RCTs included in the review articles were identified, and an additional search for recently published RCTs was performed from January 2014 to June 2020. This systematic review focused on health care utilization outcomes, including hospital readmissions for HF or any cause, emergency department (ED) visits, and length of hospital stay (LOS).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Data were summarized from 38 RCTs covering 10,871 patients. Pooled evidence suggested a mean 11% [risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82, 0.97] and 22% (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68, 0.89) risk reduction on all-cause and HF-specific readmissions, but no significant reduction (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83, 1.07) on ED visits. Findings were mixed for LOS. Subgroup analysis by different types of transitional care interventions indicated that multidisciplinary interventions currently have the best evidence for reducing readmissions up to 6 months post the index HF hospitalization. In addition, we observed an inverse linear dose-response relationship between intervention intensity (ie, frequency and duration of interventions) and complexity (ie, number of intervention components) and the risk of HF readmissions.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>Transitional care interventions for hospitalized patients with HF reduced all-cause and HF-specific readmissions, but did not decrease ED visits. Multidisciplinary interventions are highly recommended if adequate resources are available.</p>
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impact of transitional care interventions on the utilization of medical services after discharge for patients hospitalized due to heart failure. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in reducing all - cause readmission rates, heart - failure - specific readmission rates, the number of emergency department visits, and the length of hospital stay through systematic review and meta - analysis. In addition, the study also explored the dose - response relationship between intervention intensity and complexity and treatment effects. The key points of the paper include: - **Research Design**: Systematic review and meta - analysis, including dose - response relationship analysis. - **Research Subjects**: Elderly heart failure patients comparing transitional care interventions with routine care. - **Methods**: From January 2009 to October 2019, relevant systematic reviews or meta - analyses in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched, and a supplementary search was carried out from January 2014 to June 2020 to obtain recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). - **Results**: Data from 38 RCTs were pooled, covering 10,871 patients. The comprehensive evidence shows that transitional care interventions reduced the all - cause readmission rate and the heart - failure - specific readmission rate by an average of 11% (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82, 0.97) and 22% (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68, 0.89), respectively, but had no significant impact on the number of emergency department visits (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83, 1.07). The results regarding the length of hospital stay were inconsistent. - **Conclusion**: Transitional care interventions reduced all - cause and heart - failure - specific readmission rates for patients hospitalized due to heart failure, but failed to reduce the number of emergency department visits. Multidisciplinary interventions have the best evidence for reducing readmission within 6 months after discharge. The study also observed an inverse linear dose - response relationship between intervention intensity and complexity and the risk of heart - failure readmission. Through this study, the authors hope to provide a scientific basis for healthcare providers and policymakers to optimize transitional care for heart failure patients, thereby reducing the burden on the medical system and improving the quality of life of patients.