Abstract:Most software defect prediction approaches are trained and applied on data from the same project. However, often a new project does not have enough training data. Cross-project defect prediction, which uses data from other projects to predict defects in a particular project, provides a new perspective to defect prediction. In this work, we propose a HYbrid moDel Reconstruction Approach (HYDRA) for cross-project defect prediction, which includes two phases: genetic algorithm (GA) phase and ensemble learning (EL) phase. These two phases create a massive composition of classifiers. To examine the benefits of HYDRA, we perform experiments on 29 datasets from the PROMISE repository which contains a total of 11,196 instances (i.e., Java classes) labeled as defective or clean. We experiment with logistic regression as the underlying classification algorithm of HYDRA. We compare our approach with the most recently proposed cross-project defect prediction approaches: TCA+ by Nam et al., Peters filter by Peters et al., GP by Liu et al., MO by Canfora et al., and CODEP by Panichella et al. Our results show that HYDRA achieves an average F1-score of 0.544. On average, across the 29 datasets, these results correspond to an improvement in the F1-scores of 26.22, 34.99, 47.43, 28.61, and 30.14 percent over TCA+, Peters filter, GP, MO, and CODEP, respectively. In addition, HYDRA on average can discover 33 percent of all bugs if developers inspect the top 20 percent lines of code, which improves the best baseline approach (TCA+) by 44.41 percent. We also find that HYDRA improves the F1-score of Zero-R which predict all the instances to be defective by 5.42 percent, but improves Zero-R by 58.65 percent when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code. In practice, Zero-R can be hard to use since it simply predicts all of the instances to be defective, and thus developers have to inspect all of the instances to find the defective ones. Moreover, we notice the improvement of HYDRA over other baseline approaches in terms of F1-score and when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code are substantial, and in most cases the improvements are significant and have large effect sizes across the 29 datasets.

An Improved Transfer Adaptive Boosting Approach for Mixed‐project Defect Prediction

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

SDP-MTF: A Composite Transfer Learning and Feature Fusion for Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction

Cross Project Defect Prediction via Balanced Distribution Adaptation Based Transfer Learning

HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Towards Cross-Project Defect Prediction with Imbalanced Feature Sets

DSSDPP: Data Selection and Sampling Based Domain Programming Predictor for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Collective transfer learning for defect prediction

An Improved SDA Based Defect Prediction Framework for Both Within-Project and Cross-Project Class-Imbalance Problems

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Based on SMOTE and Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis

Balanced Adversarial Tight Matching for Cross‐Project Defect Prediction

S<SUP>2</SUP>LMMD: Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction via Statement Semantic Learning and Maximum Mean Discrepancy

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Considering Multiple Data Distribution Simultaneously

Cost-sensitive transfer kernel canonical correlation analysis for heterogeneous defect prediction

A Novel Class-Imbalance Learning Approach for Both Within-Project and Cross-Project Defect Prediction.

A novel instance‐based method for cross‐project just‐in‐time defect prediction

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Based on Two-Phase Feature Importance Amplification

Deep Learning for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

A software defect prediction method with metric compensation based on feature selection and transfer learning

Enhancing Cross-Project Just-In-Time Defect Prediction with Active Deep Learning