Application of Radial Artery in Arterialized Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Chinese Patients

G W He,X C Liu,Z G Liu,Z Q Wang,T N Chen,X Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.42.009
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize the application of radial artery (RA) as the second arterial graft in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods From January 1, 2015 to June 11, 2019, the clinical data of all patients undergoing CABG in TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. The patients who underwent RA grafting were included. The application of RA, internal mammary artery (IMA) and the saphenous vein, their target vessels, and the operative results were analyzed. Results A total of 2901 patients underwent CABG. Of those, 208 patients (7.2%) had RA grafting, with 197 males and 11 females. The average age was (53 ± 8) years old and the average grafts per patient was 3.79. The target vessel for RA was first obtuse marginal (OM, 102 cases), first diagonal (50 cases), right coronary artery (RCA) or posterior descending artery (PDA) (40 cases), intermediate (22 cases), respectively. Among those, 172 were single distal anastomosis with the proximal end anastomosed to the ascending aorta (168 cases), saphenous vein (SV) graft (3 cases) and IMA (1 case). Seventy-two patients accept sequential grafting with the proximal to the ascending aorta (58 cases), SV graft (13 cases) and IMA (1 case). The left IMA was mainly anastomosed to left descending artery (LAD) (188 cases) and diagonal (10 cases). The target vessels for SV were remaining coronary arteries when the IMA and RA were used. The operative time was (5.0 ± 1.5) h. The hospital stay was (17.4 ± 6.4) d. There were 6 cases undergoing exploratory thoracotomy for bleeding (5 cases) or hemodynamic instability due to ventricular arrhythmia (1 case). There was no death. All patients were successfully discharged. Conclusions Use of the RA and IMA with additional SV for CABG exhibits good results in the Chinese patients. Currently available clinical protocols are effective and safe.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?