Abstract:Background The differentiation and diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and pre-excited tachycardia (PXT) remains a challenging task, especially when typical AV dissociation is not present. The purpose of this article is to study the feasibility of a new theoretical algorithm for identifying ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and pre-excited arrhythmias (PA) rhythms (which can be used to distinguish VT from PXT, etc.). Method This study involved the deduction of a new algorithm by combining knowledge of cardiac anatomy, vectorcardiography, and cardiac electrophysiology. The new algorithm evaluated the diagnostic value through intracardiac electrophysiology in 205 cases of VA and PA. The new algorithm diagnoses VA based on the following 4-step process: 1. The QRS complex in leads II, III, and aVF shows a unidirectional R wave, and lead aVR shows a QS pattern. 2. S waves are predominant in two or more of leads I, aVF, and V6. 3. Lead V2 shows ≥3 phase waves or returning branch notching (note: returning branch refers to the band of QRS complexes returning to the baseline). 4. Lead V5 shows a negative wave in the initial portion or returning branch notching. If none of these criteria are met, the diagnosis is PA. The diagnostic value of the new algorithm is compared with the Steurer algorithm and the Vereckei algorithm (diagnosed based on the QRS waveform characteristics of the two algorithms during electrophysiological verification, excluding the diagnosis of atrioventricular dissociation). Results The new algorithm showed significant advantages in terms of AUC value (0.83 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.57), sensitivity (83.6 % vs. 23.3 % vs. 24.8 %), and accuracy (82.9 % vs. 48.3 % vs. 46.3 %) compared to the Steurer algorithm and Vereckei algorithm based on QRS waveform characteristics for diagnosing VA (137 cases) and PA (68 cases). This indicates that the new algorithm is more accurate in identifying idiopathic VA. While there was a significant difference in specificity between the New algorithm and Steurer algorithm (82.3 % vs. 98.5 %, p < 0.05), the difference with Vereckei algorithm (82.3 % vs. 89.7 %) was not significant.In the New algorithm, the sensitivity and specificity for each step are as follows: - Step 1: Sensitivity 34.3 %, Specificity 94.1 %. - Step 2: Sensitivity 24.1 %, Specificity 98.5 %. - Step 3: Sensitivity 18.3 %, Specificity 100 %. - Step 4: Sensitivity 6.6 %, Specificity 89.7 %. Step 1 had the highest AUC value, indicating the best overall diagnostic performance among all steps. Step 2 and Step 3 also performed well, while Step 4 had relatively poorer diagnostic performance. Conclusion The new algorithm is suitable for identifying the origin of VA and PA rhythms.

[Value of Ventricular Tachycardia Score in Diagnosing Pre-Excited Tachycardia].

The Characteristics of Atrial Function and Synchronism in Patients with Preexcitation Syndrome by Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging

Precordial transition and V2 transition ratio for distinguishing left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia origin

Discrimination between ventricular tachycardia and wide‐QRS preexcited tachycardia

Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm

Vereckei and Brugada algorithm for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia

Value of Single Avr Lead in Differential Diagnosis of Ventricular Tachycardia in Children

Biophysical Tissue Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate With Local Impedance Mapping to Predict Critical Sites

Electrocardiographic Parameters Effectively Predict Ventricular Tachycardia/fibrillation in Acute Phase and Abnormal Cardiac Function in Chronic Phase of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Automatic Coordinate Prediction of the Exit of Ventricular Tachycardia from 12-Lead Electrocardiogram

Spectral analysis of the cardiac cycle of signal-averaged Frank leads from patients with ventricular tachycardia

Investigation of clinical significance of ST-segment depression during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Electro-anatomically confirmed sites of origin of ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular contractions and occurrence of R wave in lead aVR: A proof of concept study

A Statistical Index for Early Diagnosis of Ventricular Arrhythmia from the Trend Analysis of ECG Phase-portraits

Clinical analysis of pre-excitation syndrome complicated with atrial fibrillation

Retrospective Study of the Electrophysiological Characteristics and Criteria of Ablation Target for Ventricular Arrhythmia Originating from Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

Arrhythmogenic vulnerability of re-entrant pathways in post-infarct ventricular tachycardia assessed by advanced computational modelling

Direct Comparison of Methods to Differentiate Wide Complex Tachycardias: Novel Automated Algorithms Versus Manual ECG Interpretation Approaches

SVT quest: The adventure diagnosing narrow QRS tachycardia

Rate of Change of Initial Intrinsicoid Deflection Predicts Endocardial Versus Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia

Temporal Variability in Electrocardiographic Indices in Subjects With Brugada Patterns