Anesthetic effects on electrophysiological responses across the visual pathway
Shiyao Zhang,Weihui Xu,Shanshan Liu,Fang Xu,Xiaopeng Chen,Huan Qin,Kai Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79240-2
IF: 4.6
2024-11-18
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Anesthetics are widely used in electrophysiological tests to assess retinal and visual system functions to avoid experimental errors caused by movement and stress in experimental animals. To determine the most suitable anesthetic for visual electrophysiological tests, excluding ketamine and chloral hydrate due to regulatory and side effect concerns, this study investigated the effects of ethyl carbamate (EC), avertin (AR), and pentobarbital sodium (PS) on visual signal conduction in the retina and primary visual cortex. Assessments included flash electroretinogram (FERG), pattern electroretinogram (PERG), pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP), and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP), FERG and FVEP were used to evaluate the responses of the retina and visual cortex to flash stimuli, respectively, while PERG and PVEP assessed responses to pattern stimuli. The research showed that AR demonstrates the least disruption to the visual signal pathway, as evidenced by consistently high characteristic peaks in the AR group across various tests. In contrast, mice given EC exhibited the lowest peak values in both FERG and FVEP, while subjects anesthetized with PS showed suppressed oscillatory potentials and PERG responses. Notably, substantial PVEP characteristic peaks were observed only in mice anesthetized with AR. Consequently, among the three anesthetics tested, AR is the most suitable for visual electrophysiological studies.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?