Treatment Strategy of Hilar and Intraglandular Stones in Wharton's Duct: A 12‐year Experience

Ya-Ning Zhao,Ya-Qiong Zhang,Li-Qi Zhang,Xiao-Yan Xie,Deng-Gao Liu,Guang-Yan Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28361
IF: 2.97
2019-01-01
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Objectives/HypothesisTo suggest a strategy for transoral removal of hilar and intraparenchymal submandibular stones.Study DesignRetrospective case series.MethodsRetrospective evaluation was performed for 514 consecutive patients with hilar and intraparenchymal submandibular stones treated via endoscopy‐assisted surgery from January 2006 to June 2018. Three patients had bilateral stones. The stones were classified as: hilar (type I), posthilar (type II), intraparenchymal (type III), and multiple stones (type IV).ResultsThe affected glands included 311 with type I, 84 with type II, 65 with type III, and 57 with type IV stones. Stones were successfully removed in 478 glands (92.5%, 478/517). Main treatment techniques included hilum ductotomy in 311 glands, intraparenchymal ductotomy in 68, submandibulotomy in 14, intraductal retrieval in 74, and hilum ductotomy accompanied by intraductal retrieval in 11. At a mean 40‐months follow‐up of 478 successful cases, clinical outcomes were good in 425, fair in 27, and poor in 26 glands. Postoperative sialograms in 75 stone‐free patients were categorized as: type I, normal (n = 6); type II, ectasia or stenosis in the main duct and no persistent contrast on functional films (n = 44); type III, ectasia or stenosis in the main duct and mild contrast retention (n = 15); and type IV, poor shape of the main duct and evident contrast retention (n = 10). Postoperative sialometry of 32 patients revealed no significant differences of the gland function between the two sides.ConclusionsAppropriate use of various endoscopy‐assisted approaches helps preserve the gland and facilitates recovery of gland function in patients with different depths of hilo‐parenchymal submandibular stones.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 130:2360–2365, 2020
What problem does this paper attempt to address?