Abstract:ABSTRACT The objective of the study is to determine the accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) infection and to compare it with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and Xpert assays. We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients admitted with suspected osteoarticular TB. Osteoarticular tissue (66.67%) and abscess specimens (33.33%) from patients were tested for MGIT, GeneXpert/RIF, and mNGS. mNGS assay detected 76 cases (46.9%) with bacterial, 63 cases (38.9%) with mycobacterial, 22 cases (13.6%) with fungal, and 1 case (0.6%) with actinomycetal organisms. These 162 pathogens were classified into 21 species. The most frequent species detected was Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (29.0%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (20.4%), Mycobacterium abscessus (5.6%), and Candida albicans (5.6%). Taking the “gold standard” TB diagnosis as the standard, the positive predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The negative predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture and assays were 94.26%, 98.29%, and 88.46%, respectively. The sensitivity of mNGS detection (85.11%) was similar to that of Xpert (95.74%) and higher than that of MGIT culture (68.08%). The specificities of mNGS detection, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The area under the curve value of the mNGS assay was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.960), which was greater than that of the MGIT culture-based assay of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.924), which was similar to 0.979 (95% CI: 0.945, 1.000) for Xpert assay. The pathogen detection rate of mNGS in diagnosing suspected osteoarticular TB exceeded that of conventional methods. IMPORTANCE In the detection of unknown infectious disease pathogens, the overall efficacy of traditional detection methods, such as culture, is low, and traditional PCR testing is also limited to the gene sequences of known pathogenic microorganisms. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) performs DNA sequencing by studying the entire microbial community genome in a given sample, without the need for isolation and culture. Previous studies have shown that mNGS performs better on pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples when compared with Xpert, traditional pathogenetic tests, and even parallel diagnostics. However, it should be emphasized that only a few studies have explored the performance of mNGS in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples associated with bone and joint infections. We conducted this retrospective study to provide additional data to support the use of mNGS in the clinical setting to identify pathogens within abscesses or tissue samples associated with bone and joint infections.

Clinical Evaluation of Diagnosis Efficacy of Active Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Infection via Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Direct Clinical Samples.

Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Technology, Culture and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice at a Tertiary General Hospital

ddPCR provides a sensitive test compared with GeneXpert MTB/RIF and mNGS for suspected Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of osteoarticular tissue for the diagnosis of suspected osteoarticular tuberculosis

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex detection: a meta-analysis

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex detection: a meta-analysis

[Application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of different types of tuberculosis].

Diagnostic efficiency of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected spinal tuberculosis in China: A multicenter prospective study

Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Performance of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing and metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients

Comparison of the Efficacy of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing and Xpert MTB/RIF in the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis.

The performance of detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in lung biopsy tissue by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Prevalence, Strains, and Drug Susceptibility of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolates from Tuberculous Suspects

Diagnostic accuracy and microbial profiles of tuberculous pleurisy: a comparative study of metagenomic next generation sequencing and GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Evaluation of next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis infection

The Feasibility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing to Identify Pathogens Causing Tuberculous Meningitis in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Metagenomic next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing When Applied to Clinical Practice.

Assessment of Current Diagnostic Algorithm for Detection of Mixed Infection with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Multicenter Evaluation of the Biochip Assay for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterial Isolates in Smear-Positive Specimens