Abstract:Basalt discrimination diagrams have been widely used for determining tectonic settings. Since the first basalt discrimination diagram was proposed by Pearce in 1971 , dozens of discrimination diagrams have emerged. However, the information in a discrimination diagram is usually 2 similar to 3 elements, and the amount of samples for designing a discrimination diagram was usually small, leading to a limitation of their applications. To improve the effectiveness and accuracy of determination, in this study, a set of methods based on intelligent algorithms and chemical composition of basalts is presented. The samples used in this research comprise 3 kinds of basalts: mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) , ocean island basalts (OIB) and island arc basalts (IAB). The amount of the samples analyzed is 755. At first, three trace elements discrimination diagrams and two major elements discrimination diagrams, including TiO2-MnO-P2O5 diagram, FeOT-MgO-Al2O3 diagram, Ti-Zr-Y diagram, Zr/Y-Zr diagram and Ti-Zr diagram, are adopted for plotting the samples. Considering the limitations of the diagrams, the samples should be filtered before being plotted. The results show that the Zr/Y-Zr diagram can reach a high accuracy of 90% with the filtered samples. However, its accuracy is less than 75% when using the whole samples. In this paper, the methods of Naive Bayes (NB) , K-Nearest Neighbors ( KNN) , Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) are adopted for determination. In training, every sample is represented by a 51-dimension vector that comprises 11 major elements, 35 trace elements and 5 isotopes, and they are not filtered. It shows that the worst result is made by NB, yet still has more than 75% of accuracy. The best result is made by RF, and its training accuracy is 100%. In the advanced analysis, the results show that the RF can reach a high validation accuracy of 88. 46%. To improve the practicability of intelligent algorithms, the Bayes theorem is used to calculate the inverse probabilities. After that, by simulating data missing, the robust of the algorithms are verified, and it shows that RF and NB are the best. Finally, by extracting the decision trees of RF algorithm, the importance of the 51 features of samples are calculated, and then the major elements and trace elements that affect the determination most are found out. In conclusion, it is more effective, accurate and functional to determine tectonic settings by intelligent algorithms, and this set of method is worthy of promotion.

A Mathematical Model Based on Bayesian Theory and Gaussian Copula for the Discrimination of Gabbroic Rocks from Three Tectonic Settings

A Practical Approach for Tectonic Discrimination of Basalts Using Geochemical Data Through Machine Learning

An Automated Method to Generate and Evaluate Geochemical Tectonic Discrimination Diagrams Based on Topological Theory

Geochemical discrimination and characteristics of magmatic tectonic settings; a machine learning-based approach

Tectonic Discrimination of Olivine in Basalt Using Data Mining Techniques Based on Major Elements: a Comparative Study from Multiple Perspectives

An Introduction to SGTPPR: Sparse Geochemical Tectono‐Magmatic Setting Probabilistic MembershiP DiscriminatoR

Intelligent determination and data mining for tectonic settings of basalts based on big data methods

Basalt Tectonic Discrimination Using Combined Machine Learning Approach

Tectonic discrimination and application based on convolution neural network and incomplete big data

Discriminating among Tectonic Settings of Spinel Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms

Solving petrological problems through machine learning: the study case of tectonic discrimination using geochemical and isotopic data

Geochemical fingerprinting of continental and oceanic basalts: A machine learning approach

Machine Learning for Reconstructing the Primary Carbon Contents of Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalts

Explainable Machine Learning to Uncover Hydrogen Diffusion Mechanism in Clinopyroxene

Discrimination of Quartz Genesis Based on Explainable Machine Learning

Machine learning with model selection to predict TOC from mineralogical constituents: case study in the Sichuan Basin

Classification and Nomenclature of Volcanic Rocks Using Immobile Elements: A Novel Approach Based on Big Data Analysis

Study on discriminant method of rock type for porous carbonate reservoirs based on Bayesian theory

An Approach for the Classification of Rock Types Using Machine Learning of Core and Log Data

Interpretable Machine Learning for Geochemical Anomaly Delineation in the Yuanbo Nang District, Gansu Province, China

Machine learning for geochemical exploration: classifying metallogenic fertility in arc magmas and insights into porphyry copper deposit formation